Search for: "APPLICATION OF GRAHAM" Results 561 - 580 of 1,574
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2017, 9:04 am by John Elwood
LeBlanc, 16-1177, concluding that Graham v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 6:23 am by Lindsay Offutt
Under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA) [text], "a state prisoner is eligible for federal habeas corpus relief if the underlying state court merits ruling was 'contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law.'" The Supreme Court's ruling in Graham... [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 6:08 am by Michael M. O'Hear
The Fourth Circuit noted the highly discretionary nature of geriatric release under Virginia law, which effectively permits the releasing authority to disregard an applicant’s “demonstrated maturity and rehabilitation,” contrary to Graham. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 6:08 am by Michael M. O'Hear
The Fourth Circuit noted the highly discretionary nature of geriatric release under Virginia law, which effectively permits the releasing authority to disregard an applicant’s “demonstrated maturity and rehabilitation,” contrary to Graham. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 6:08 am by Michael M. O'Hear
The Fourth Circuit noted the highly discretionary nature of geriatric release under Virginia law, which effectively permits the releasing authority to disregard an applicant’s “demonstrated maturity and rehabilitation,” contrary to Graham. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 4:45 am by Edith Roberts
Sandoz Inc., the court held that provisions requiring disclosure of information by an applicant for a biosimilar license are not enforceable by an injunction in federal court, and that an applicant may provide notice of commercial marketing before obtaining a license. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 10:36 am by John Elwood
Lee and congressional direction; and (3) whether the “broadest reasonable interpretation” of patent claims, upheld in Cuozzo for use in inter partes review, requires the application of traditional claim construction principles, including disclaimer by disparagement of prior art and reading claims in light of the patent’s specification. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 11:34 am by Aurora Barnes
Commonwealth was an objectively unreasonable application of Graham v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 11:54 am by Kevin LaCroix
Graham (here) that there is “no meaningful difference in the definitions of disgorgement and forfeiture” and added that disgorgement can be “considered a subset of forfeiture. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 9:00 am by Russell Spivak
Two weeks ago, CNN reported that “White House lawyers have begun researching impeachment procedures in an effort to prepare for what officials still believe is a distant possibility that President Donald Trump could have to fend off attempts to remove him from office. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 6:36 am by John Elwood
Commonwealth was an objectively unreasonable application of Graham v. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 8:33 am by Rebecca Tushnet
In 2013, defendants released an album titled Nothing Was the Same (the “Album”) by Aubrey Drake Graham (Drake). [read post]
31 May 2017, 8:55 pm by Rory Little
” On appeal, the 9th Circuit affirmed this application of its doctrine. [read post]
27 May 2017, 1:56 pm by Josh Blackman
Trump, one would think the court’s analysis amounts to routine application of well-settled precedent. [read post]
26 May 2017, 7:06 am by Jared Dummitt, Eliot Kim
” However, according to Euan Graham of the Lowy Institute in Australia, “One operation won’t allay fears about Trump’s transactional approach toward China and its apparent disinterest in defending international and legal rights. [read post]
26 May 2017, 6:29 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the April 13, April 21, April 28, May 11 and May 18 conferences)   Graham v. [read post]