Search for: "Am. Federation of State, Etc. v. State, Etc."
Results 561 - 580
of 593
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2018, 9:16 am
We will see where that takes the people, the state, and the revolution. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 11:08 am
In Canada v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
If you work at a federal agency, please, please, please read this paper . . . [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 11:22 am
I myself am concededly pretty ignorant in the premises. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 5:06 pm
The operation of the poison pill are complicated, and I am simplifying things a bit, but here's the basic idea. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 2:15 pm
Now, my views on this story: Am I being asked to believe that Tracy Lawrence took her own life because she might have been sentenced to up to a year in jail and a perhaps fined two grand? [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 3:46 pm
” And this is why the one thing in Washington that has had bipartisan support in the last decade came when Both Democrat and Republican congressmen…expressed alarm at revelations that the NSA was building an unprecedented database of phone records with the help of three major US telephone companies.6 In fact, although alleged precedents regarding moving objects, like ships, have expanded the rule so that now cars, wagons, things transiting public spaces, etc., today receive… [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 1:46 pm
I am an optimist, but not a tech utopianist. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 6:00 am
Since being called as a witness, Nigel Wright’s testimony has taken center stage in the media every day, and the probing of the inner workings of the PMO has provided terrific press fodder – especially in the middle of a federal election campaign. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 1:57 pm
Federal dilution law; progression from common law to statutory right of publicity and almost inevitable call for federal uniformity; federal trade secrets law. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 8:11 am
" Words like these are refreshing, as we have not seen that level of top-down commitment to customer service at the USPTO in nearly a decade.Patent-Term Adjustments under WyethThe recent decision from the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Wyeth v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 11:57 am
SCARFE J.P., R. v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 11:57 am
SCARFE J.P., R. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2006, 6:47 am
One of the opinions, written by The Reactionary Easterbrook, and allowing companies to screw older workers out of major portions of pensions they were counting on and had worked for decades to get (a problem not faced by the federal judges who allowed this), has been the subject of a couple of recent blogs. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 1:54 pm
AB 2535 comes on the heels of the recent federal decision, Garnett v. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 10:39 pm
In this case, it was Hirst v UK (No2). [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:44 am
Which is strange, because during this time she is mentioned in a November 2, 2001 Justice Department press release as the contact for public comments on the DOJ consent decree with Microsoft–at which point she was the lower rank of “Trial Attorney” before being promoted to Section Chief in January 2002: The proposed Final Judgment will be published by the Federal Register, along with the Department’s Competitive Impact Statement, as required by the… [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 10:04 pm
The Court’s opinion in Christopher v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 1:21 pm
IBC Business Owners for Sensible Development v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 7:06 am
It arises under SIPA which is contained in Title 15 of the United States Code. [read post]
