Search for: "Andrews v. State of California"
Results 561 - 580
of 909
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2014, 5:53 am
Briefly: In The Atlantic, Andrew Cohen discusses Monday’s denial of certiorari in Owens v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 8:17 am
The Legislative Budget Board, however, proposed a number of additions to this cost, to better take into account the costs of complying with Ruiz v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 11:36 am
In Andrews v. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 9:25 am
John’s Anglican Church in Petaluma, CA ; Episcopal Diocese of Northern California v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 7:14 pm
(Legislature v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 1:11 pm
King and Andrew B. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 5:30 pm
Horton v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 8:59 am
In the wake of King v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm
Burns, the Johns Hopkins University ; Andrew L. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Comment k could correspond to Led Zeppelin, and state of the art might be The Who.And it seems that, for each of these bands, there’s a song we really like that gets slighted (in our opinion) when it comes to air time on classic rock stations. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 5:32 am
At the Brennan Center for Justice, Andrew Cohen responds to an editorial in The Wall Street Journal that criticizes Attorney General Eric Holder and cites the Court’s decision in Crawford v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 2:34 pm
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 12:50 pm
Igors NagaicevsCase number: 12-cv-0413 (United States District Court for the Northern District of California)Case filed: January 26, 2012Qualifying judgment/order: July 18, 2013 8/16/2013 11/14/2013 2013-73 SEC v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 1:38 am
As discussed here, in June 2012, Central District of California Judge R. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 3:11 pm
State and the federal First Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 7:59 am
Andrews recently decided defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction or, in the alternative, to transfer the case to the Northern District of California in Round Rock Research LLC v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 12:12 pm
The case is Fifield v. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 6:38 am
Coverage of the Court continues to focus on the fallout from its recent decisions in United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 2:55 pm
The document itself does not state any reasons. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 5:44 am
Coverage continues of the Court’s decisions in United States v. [read post]
