Search for: "Andrews v. State of New York"
Results 561 - 580
of 1,674
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2019, 4:04 am
New York, a high-profile challenge to the Trump administration’s decision to add a question about citizenship to the 2020 census. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 3:58 am
” At the Brennan Center for Justice, Andrew Cohen maintains that “[w]hat Justice Gorsuch and the rest of the Court’s conservatives are saying” in Bucklew v. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 4:03 pm
TechStock Standard has a post “David Kramer spread Steele dossier around Washington during Trump transition” The Press Gazette reports that Michael Leidig and Central European News have filed a notice of appeal after their $11m libel action against Buzzfeed was dismissed by a judge in New York. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 12:56 pm
In Gray v. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 4:13 am
” Additional coverage comes from Andrew Chung at Reuters. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 7:45 pm
“Limiting Agency Power, a Goal of the Right, Gets Supreme Court Test”: Adam Liptak of The New York Times has this report. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 8:00 pm
“Justices Display Divisions in New Cases on Voting Maps Warped by Politics”: Adam Liptak of The New York Times has this report. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 2:44 pm
Benisek and Rucho v. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 10:43 am
., L.P. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 3:53 am
” In Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 4:05 am
2019 NY Slip Op 30582(U) March 7, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 653953/2018 Judge: Andrew Borrok finds that there was no such question asked. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 1:55 pm
The Supreme Court effectively redefined the concept in 1922 in United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2019, 5:16 am
And Brian Corcoran examined how Mondelez v. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 3:56 am
For The New York Times, Adam Liptak remarks that “Justice Clarence Thomas was busy in February[:] As usual, he asked no questions during Supreme Court arguments,” [b]ut he made up for his silence with three opinions in eight days that took issue with some of the court’s most prominent precedents,” including New York Times v. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 4:17 am
For The New York Times, Adam Liptak reports that the court “seemed ready … to allow a 40-foot cross honoring soldiers who died in World War I to remain in place on public land in Maryland. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 2:14 pm
Miller, according to the New York Times, is planning to appeal the D.C. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 4:03 am
” For The New York Times, Adam Liptak writes that The American Legion v. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 4:23 pm
Blog Law Online has a post “Is New York Times v Sullivan in danger? [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
”[72] Justice L’Heureux-Dubé, however, did not agree that an expression stated in the positive (i.e., a “significant contributing cause”) meant the same thing as one stated in the negative (i.e., “not a trivial cause”). [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am
New York,3 that the Supreme Court matter-of-factly held that the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment was “of course” applicable to the states.4 To justify incorporation, Penn Central cited only one 19th century case, which itself did not mention the Fifth Amendment.5 Before Penn Central, the Court relied on the Due Process Clause to restrict the scope of state taking power. [read post]
