Search for: "Application of Barrett" Results 561 - 580 of 1,069
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am by Guest Author
One of the moves in the Brunstein-Goodson piece is downplaying economic and political significance as a factor for the MQD’s application. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 7:13 am by Jim Oleske
” After denying the first two applications that reached it last spring and summer, the court granted five similar applications between November and February after Justice Amy Coney Barrett joined the court. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 7:34 am by DONALD SCARINCI
The court concluded that the City’s proposed contractual terms stated a neutral and generally applicable policy under Smith. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:10 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Petitioners then sued respondents—state officials who oversee the processing of licensing applications—for declaratory and injunctive relief, alleging that respondents violated their Second andFourteenth Amendment rights by denying their unrestricted-license applications for failure to demonstrate a unique need for self-defense. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:10 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Petitioners then sued respondents—state officials who oversee the processing of licensing applications—for declaratory and injunctive relief, alleging that respondents violated their Second andFourteenth Amendment rights by denying their unrestricted-license applications for failure to demonstrate a unique need for self-defense. [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 10:01 pm by Josh Blackman
Good for Justices Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 5:08 am by Will Baude
S. ___, ___ (2021) (BARRETT, J., concurring in denial of application for injunctive relief) (slip op., at 1) (warning that the Court should not act "on a short fuse without benefit of full briefing and oral argument" in a case that is "first to address the questions presented"). [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 4:46 pm by Amy Howe
There are, Whitaker stressed, “clearly constitutional applications of the law. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 12:58 pm by Sam Callahan and Allon Kedem
Like several of her colleagues, Barrett homed in on Section 231g and the apparent difficulties it created for Salinas’ position. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 5:36 pm by Amy Howe
The court’s newest justice, Amy Coney Barrett, appeared less enthusiastic about overruling Smith. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 5:17 am by Will Baude
These questions, and this framework, will have application beyond Rahimi. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 1:43 pm by Lydia Estep
Oracle America, Inc. in favor of Google by a 6-2 majority, with Barrett not participating. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 6:13 pm by Josh Blackman
S. ___, ___–___ (2021) (slip op., at 7–9); Thomas explains that Reed cannot seek an advisory opinion: Unless Reed merely seeks an advisory opinion, his due process challenge to Chapter 64 must seek relief from some concrete enforcement or application of that law that affects him.More specifically, Reed must be challenging either (1) some conduct of the district attorney constituting enforcement of Chapter 64 against him or (2) the CCA's application ofChapter 64 as… [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 10:18 pm by Josh Blackman
Justices Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett denied all relief. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 5:14 am by Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman
(Matt McClain/ The Washington Post) Our first, second and third posts, based on briefs we submitted to the District Courts for the Southern District of New York and the District of Columbia, explained that because the president does not hold an “Office . . . under the United States,” he or she is not subject to the foreign emoluments clause. [read post]
7 Jul 2024, 9:06 pm by Peter Shane
” On this point, even Justice Amy Coney Barrett, in her partial concurrence, jumps ship. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 8:35 am by Eugene Volokh
In many states, this is an absolute privilege, applicable even when the reporter knows that the statements within those proceedings are likely to be false. [read post]