Search for: "Arnold v. Arnold" Results 561 - 580 of 2,142
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2015, 2:37 pm
The CJEU’s ruling in DHL v ChronopostThe CJEU made it manifestly clear in its 2011 ruling in Case C-235/09 DHL v Chronopost [see previous Katpost here] that a Europe-wide injunction should only be granted in order to ensure that the proprietor can protect his trade mark, prohibiting only uses which affect or are liable to affect the functions of the trade mark. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 1:14 am by Eleonora Rosati
·        The Beijing Treaty on Audiovisual Performances·        Amendments to the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 made by the Copyright and Rights in Performances (Research, Education, Libraries and Archives) Regulations 2014, the Copyright and Rights in Performances (Disability) Regulations 2014, the Copyright (Public Administration) Regulations 2014, the Copyright and Rights and… [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 6:45 am
 In that decision, Arnold J concluded that there is no single meaning rule for trade marks. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 3:33 am by Florian Mueller
And on Friday (December 6), the Munich I Regional Court will announce a ruling on a German Nokia v. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 6:25 am
According to the Appellate Division, First Department, claiming someone is “connected” is not slanderous.In July 2005, Philip Galasso supposedly removed trees and a fence from Arnold Saltzman’s property. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 8:43 am
And now, here is a legal first, straight from the pen (well, keyboard) of our Mr Justice Arnold in joined cases Actavis Group hf v Eli Lilly & Company (USA)/Medis ehf v Eli Lilly & Company (USA) [2012] EWHC 3316 (Pat) on whether the English Courts have jurisdiction over issues of infringement of foreign-designated patents. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 3:23 pm
Yesterday was a good day for Patents Court (England and Wales) judge Mr Justice Arnold. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am by Mark Summerfield
  The second article will cover the split decision in the UK, and how the differing opinions of eminent patent jurists Arnold LJ and Birss LJ stack up. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 1:00 pm
Premier League v BT, UEFA v BT, Matchroom v BT and Queensberry v BT). [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 7:05 am
Lauri Rechardt got the ball rolling by suggesting that the time and money required to make such applications would mean that this did not happen, and in the copyright context, the record industry still regards these applications as being cases they cannot afford to lose, and so its battles are picked carefully and the work is done meticulously to ensure the result.Eleonora Rosati pointed out that Cartier is the first occasion on which an application for a website-blocking order against… [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 4:47 pm
The case goes back to 2005, when a US citizen named Michael Arnold (US -v- Arnold) returned to the US from the Philippines. [read post]