Search for: "Arnold v. Arnold"
Results 561 - 580
of 2,322
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2018, 12:42 pm
Acevedo v. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 10:05 am
South Dakota v. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 7:44 am
Back in mid-January (sorry for the delay in reporting this decision, dear IPKat readers), Mr Justice Arnold handed down his judgment in the long-standing easy trade mark battle: W3 Ltd v Easygroup Ltd & Anor [2018] EWHC 7.The core issue was whether the sign “EasyRoommate” and its variants which were owned by the Claimant, W3, infringed any of the the easyGroup's EU trade marks. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 8:00 am
Arnold v. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 8:00 am
Arnold v. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 7:58 am
Accordingly, it seems reasonable to interpret the Teva v. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 6:00 am
Callahan, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, on Friday, July 20, 2018 Tags: Janus Capital v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 12:11 am
Arnold J's conclusion that LNDR and LDNR are confusingly similar is far from controversial. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 6:30 am
Last year the High Court of England and Wales (Arnold J) in FAPL v BT [2017] EWHC 480 Ch concluded that it had jurisdiction under section 97A of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act to order to block access to streaming services (rather than the more tradition case of websites) giving unauthorised access to protected content. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 6:15 am
Lorenzo’s petition for certiorari in Lorenzo v. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 1:11 pm
Because fashion shows were recognized as full-fledged copyright works (‘oeuvres de l’esprit’) under French law by the Civil Supreme Court (Court de Cassation) in 2008 (decision: Ashby v Gaulme, Kenzo et Lacroix (2008) ; Ashby Donald and Others v France [2013] ECHR 28; see here). [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 11:16 am
This was in Murphy v. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 4:05 pm
The trial judge, Arnold J, had already granted the claimant permission to appeal on quantum. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 6:19 am
Sama, and Jennifer Wieboldt, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, on Wednesday, July 11, 2018 Tags: Cross-border transactions, Morrison v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 6:12 am
” The district court had dismissed, citing Morrison v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 3:29 pm
Additional Resources: Fireworks are illegal — but here’s how Floridians get away with buying them, July 3, 2018, By Kyle Arnold, Orlando Sentinel More Blog Entries: Florida Wrongful Death Claims: Awards to Survivors v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 3:29 pm
Additional Resources: Fireworks are illegal — but here’s how Floridians get away with buying them, July 3, 2018, By Kyle Arnold, Orlando Sentinel More Blog Entries: Florida Wrongful Death Claims: Awards to Survivors v. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 1:30 pm
Co. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:41 am
October 11, 2017); Arnold v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 12:35 am
Therefore, when Cartier first came to trial at the High Court, Arnold J was required to refer to the EU Directives to reach the conclusion that the same sort of injunction should be available to prevent access to a website selling counterfeit goods which infringe a trade mark right. [read post]
