Search for: "B/T Enterprises"
Results 561 - 580
of 2,100
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2011, 8:47 am
Seitz, to be an Assistant Attorney General, Office of Legal Counsel, and Donald B. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 7:22 pm
Those of us in the world of private enterprise who've worked for business entities that have been merged out of existence are expected to suck it up and transfer to Plan B in our career track. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 6:18 am
Finally, if you missed it, Washington State needs your money, so they’ve “clarified” that director fees are subject to B&O tax. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 7:25 pm
Then again, I'm merely a tool of private enterprise and not a free thinker with a big picture view like those in D.C.Another Bank Fail Friday approaches. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 8:37 am
(I’m pretty sure that the “incontestable” part there doesn’t work, inasmuch as §33(b) is in the statute precisely to establish descriptive fair use as a defense as to incontestable marks.) [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 3:45 pm
First, under the concept of “Enterprise Coverage”, the FLSA applies to all employees of any company that (a) has more than $500,000 in annual revenues and (b) is engaged in interstate commerce. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 1:02 am
Second, Oh-Willeke, though admitting that the "world certainly isn't free of exploitation," claims that "those who participate in creating wealth, even as 'replaceable underlings' typically come out far ahead of those who aren't involved at all. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 10:15 am
It isn't groundbreaking law. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 6:00 pm
Someone recently told me that you can't argue with a story, only with a position or another argument. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 5:58 am
(Arguably, a properly functioning non-discrimination obligation wouldn't need an exception, because legitimate policy purposes could be taken into account in the obligation itself.) [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 5:58 am
(Arguably, a properly functioning non-discrimination obligation wouldn't need an exception, because legitimate policy purposes could be taken into account in the obligation itself.) [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 4:20 pm
” “[T]here is no reason whatsoever to treat exemptions from such Peter-to-Paul mandates as uniquely disfavored under RFRA. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 4:27 am
“Commercial information” means “commercial information,” and it can’t simply mean any information held by or concerning a commercial enterprise. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 6:54 am
The Law Factory Debate: Another Perspective and a companion post, Apple Meets the Law Factory came from Steven B. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 2:07 pm
As he explains, [I]t is from a detailed examination of particular historical circumstances and meanings . . . that sociology develops and refines its perspectives and general concepts. [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 9:55 am
§ 3117(b); see also Fed. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 3:05 am
Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 8:25 pm
We use Domain Tools but it doesn't compile the data in a report. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 1:41 pm
The court held that the AI-generated work is protectable by copyright law since it is as a work of legal entities.Eleonora Rosati discussed the decision of the UK Intellectual Property Enterprise Court in Response Clothing Ltd v The Edinburgh Woollen Mill Ltd case. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 1:34 pm
What caught my eye about the case of JTH TAX, LLC d/b/a Liberty Tax Service v. [read post]
