Search for: "Baker v. State" Results 561 - 580 of 3,226
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2019, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
Instead, in Murphy v Callinan [2018] IESC 59 (30 November 2018) Baker J (Clarke CJ and Dunne J concurring) approved and applied Collins. [read post]
29 May 2009, 12:12 pm
A Texan by birth/stays a Texan/anywhere on earth. __________________________________________________________________________________________________ California Court of Appeal Holds that Home State "Permission To Sue" Procedures Are Substantive Rules After All In a case of first impression, the California Court of Appeal in Vaughn v. [read post]
The SEC stated that “the Commission will hold investment advisers accountable when they do not accurately describe their incorporation of ESG factors into their investment selection process. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 6:59 pm by Ilya Somin
  Today, Texas state trial Judge David Peeples issued a decision in Van Stean v. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
Colorado Civil Rights Commission, “[a] divided Supreme Court said on Monday that a Colorado baker and cake artist was wrongly censored by the state of Colorado for refusing to make a cake for a same-sex couple’s wedding party. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
At The Daily Caller, Kevin Daley reports that “Christian baker Jack Phillips and the Colorado Civil Rights Commission … have resolved a legal dispute that set Phillips’ religious beliefs against the state’s public accommodations law”; the settlement “provides that the Commission will close an ongoing anti-discrimination probe of Phillips’s Masterpiece Cakeshop,” the subject of a high-profile Supreme Court case last term, “if… [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 6:27 pm
Tomorrow morning the Court will hear oral argument in No. 05-1448, Beck v. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 12:50 pm
On a night when CAAF released its blockbuster opinion in Lopez de Victoria, we can't expect many people to want to go see the small indie release of United States v. [read post]