Search for: "Bank of New York v. United States"
Results 561 - 580
of 1,940
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2018, 7:49 am
The father quit his job in Virginia and relocated to Onondaga County in order to rehabilitate his relationship with his son, which had suffered since the child was moved to New York. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 4:46 am
This issue was considered earlier this year n the case of Rock Advertising Limited v MWB Business Exchange Centres Limited. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 1:26 pm
District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 1:26 pm
District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 12:03 pm
All states except for Illinois, New York and Washington have adopted UETA, but each of those three states has its own laws recognizing electronic signatures. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 7:15 am
New York ex rel. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm
Using a tool that was employed traditionally for companies in financial trouble, the New York regulator planned to utilize independent outside monitors as part of settlements with accused institutions. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 4:29 pm
United States The internet cases blog has covered the case of Benson v. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 8:02 pm
Research and Resources Libel actions – here or the United States? [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 4:00 am
Of note, the Alberta Court relied on legal developments in the United States in its decision. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 11:00 pm
The court acknowledged that the parties were also involved in a trademark dispute in the United Arab Emirates, but “there is nothing unreasonable about Alibaba’s turning to a court in the United States to protect its United States trademarks, to enjoin Defendants from committing infringing acts in the United States, and otherwise to seek relief under United States (and New York) law. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 11:00 pm
The court acknowledged that the parties were also involved in a trademark dispute in the United Arab Emirates, but “there is nothing unreasonable about Alibaba’s turning to a court in the United States to protect its United States trademarks, to enjoin Defendants from committing infringing acts in the United States, and otherwise to seek relief under United States (and New York) law. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 3:00 pm
United States, 490 U.S. 858, 873-74 (1989); see also Fed. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 2:20 pm
No. 17-1323 (MN).United States District Court, D. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 9:00 am
First, there was no general personal jurisdiction because neither organization had the sorts of ties to New York that would qualify them as “essentially at home” there, as required by the Supreme Court’s 2014 holding in Daimler Ag v. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 4:33 pm
Ironically, the hack into the EDGAR database, which was also the subject of testimony from SEC Chairman Jay Clayton before the Senate Banking Committee brought the SEC’s previously quiet but steadfast outsider trading foray into the spotlight. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
I would add that Gienapp’s assertion makes hash not only of those who fixate on the conventions in Philadelphia or the various state capitals (plus Poughkeepsie, the surprising locale of New York’s ratifying convention), but also of those who believe, say, that The Federalist, written during this same period by highly motivated partisans of constitutional ratification, offers some specially privileged insight into constitutional meaning. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 3:45 am
United States, a case involving flood damage allegedly resulting from the government’s failure to protect the banks of a canal in Louisiana from erosion, and make clear that “when the government, whether through action or inaction, takes private property, it has a distinct, well-established responsibility to compensate landowners. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 6:44 pm
Discussion This long-running case has already made one trip to the New York Court of Appeals, and it seems likely that the case is about to make a return visit to New York’s highest court. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 10:36 am
Supreme Court in the Morrison v. [read post]
