Search for: "Bare v. Bare"
Results 561 - 580
of 4,454
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2020, 10:34 am
Medinol Ltd. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:35 pm
Fifth Circuit, in Brown v. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 10:54 am
Stern v. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 11:51 am
The justices added just one new case to their merits docket for the term: Carney v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 10:37 pm
Woodruff v. [read post]
2 Sep 2024, 7:36 am
The New York State court system is barely functional. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 12:14 am
I can see Mr Farage shouting obscenities at opposing football fans and flicking V signs, safe in the knowledge that the Police presence will ensure that there is no ‘physical’ retaliation. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 1:16 pm
came close to crashing down Thursday in a Supreme Court decision so brief that it was barely mentioned by Chief Justice John G. [read post]
7 Jul 2006, 2:28 am
The Canadian decision's in Bouzari v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 12:52 pm
Turner was barely 5–4 last time around, so if the Court grants cert, things could potentially be wide open given changing circumstances during the intervening years and given the Court’s three (soon four) new members. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 3:31 am
Michael Hugh Kelly protested against the war in Iraq during the Republican National Convention in St. [read post]
8 Sep 2007, 6:47 am
Barker and Warner v. [read post]
16 Apr 2025, 4:11 pm
Barely a dozen pages. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 4:25 am
A Discussion of SEB v. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 7:15 pm
And the issue was barely addressed overtly — popping up once in a partial dissent to a summary disposition. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 1:05 pm
But to say that the thing's unanimous overlooks key differences between the panel members -- differences that may well suggest that the Supreme Court might well take a different view of the subject.The lead opinion -- for a bare majority of 6 of the 11 judges -- says that an employer can never be considered as a justification for paying women less than men. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 2:20 pm
Defendant wants discovery from the Riverside DA for more information about the charging details.To obtain such discovery, you've got to produce "some evidence" tending to show discriminatory intent and effect, and/or to sustain your requested discovery "by plausible justification".The California Supreme Court holds that defendant's study doesn't satisfy this standard because it's not detailed enough; instead, it's a "bare statistical comparison of the race of homicide victims in… [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 12:43 pm
Even assuming all the other findings are unsupported, barely more than one-half of the agency’s findings related to credibility are unsupported, hardly a “vast majority. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 7:14 am
Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009), and Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am
A supreme flouting of the military and industrial contexts can be found in DeVries v. [read post]
