Search for: "Barrett"
Results 561 - 580
of 6,382
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2023, 7:20 am
However, neither Justice Barrett nor any other Justice challenged Mr. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 7:04 am
Supreme Court decision in an argued case: Justice Amy Coney Barrett delivered the opinion of the Court in Acheson Hotels, LLC v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 1:42 pm
ShareIt has been 27 years since the prescription opioid OxyContin first came on the market. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 11:45 am
With Thomas and the Trump trio – Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Barrett – this is the crew that struck down Roe v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:23 am
Alito’s confirmation in 2006 kicked off a shift to the right that accelerated with the arrival of three justices – Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett – nominated by former President Donald Trump. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:00 am
Details of Scott Perry’s Role in Trump Efforts to Stay in Power Unsealed MSN – Rachel Weiner, Spencer Hsu, and Devlin Barrett (Washington Post) | Published: 11/30/2023 A batch of communications was released in the case of U.S. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 6:41 am
Barrett Financial Group, LLC, 2023 WL 7552330 (D. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:50 am
Because the government now agrees with petitioner Paul Erlinger that judges cannot constitutionally make that finding, the court appointed Nick Harper, former clerk to Justice Amy Coney Barrett, to argue in support of the judgment below. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:28 am
Barrett asked several questions trying to identify exactly how much the statutory action differs from the common-law action, and questioning how different it needs to be. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 10:07 am
In a concurring opinion, Justice Brett Kavanaugh (joined by Justice Amy Coney Barrett) agreed with Justice Thomas that Article II issues are raised by the False Claims Act’s qui tam provisions and that the Court should consider them in an appropriate case down the road. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:00 pm
" That referred to then-Judge Barrett's dissent in Kanter v. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 1:17 pm
" Second, the Court will likely conclude that one such historical principle—as then-Judge Barrett has already argued in detail—is that the government may forbid those who have been shown to be dangerous to keep and bear arms. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 1:33 pm
(The New York Times picked up Justice Barrett's question). [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 5:30 am
I, along with my colleague Seth Barrett Tillman, contend that the President is not an "Officer of the United States" for purposes of Section 3. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 9:56 am
“Justices Kavanaugh And Barrett’s Shadow Docket Concurrence In The Hamburger Mary’s Case; The good, the bad, and the ugly”: Josh Blackman has this post at “The Volokh Conspiracy. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 5:30 am
Ditto for Justice Barrett. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 3:46 am
But Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman made a fair historical and textual case that elected officials were not “officers,” and that included the president and vice president. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 2:32 pm
Statement of Justice Kavanaugh, with whom Justice Barrett joins except as to footnote 1 [noted in braces below -EV], respecting the denial of the application for stay. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 7:36 pm
Kavanaugh and Barrett appeared to disagree with the grounds upon which the state of Florida appealed the lower court’s ruling. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 4:23 pm
This is the argument that Seth Barrett Tillman and I have advanced. [read post]
