Search for: "Bates v. AT" Results 561 - 580 of 980
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2018, 11:31 am by Micah Buchdahl
There were hot-button issues sitting on my desk, and the equally red-hot debate over making the first substantial changes to the Rules of Professional Conduct related to law firm marketing since Bates v Arizona in 1977. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 11:31 am by Micah Buchdahl
There were hot-button issues sitting on my desk, and the equally red-hot debate over making the first substantial changes to the Rules of Professional Conduct related to law firm marketing since Bates v Arizona in 1977. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 10:32 pm
He handles Criminal Defense cases including DWI.Given that this stands no chance of ever remaining law (Lawyers have a right to advertise Bates v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 10:12 am by Larry Bodine
The ABA’s proposed actions will cause a chilling effect on a lawyer’s right to commercial free speech, first established In Bates v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 8:32 am by azatty
“The state that begat lawyer advertising (remember Bates v. [read post]
23 May 2008, 6:31 pm
John Mayoue of Warner, Mayoue, Bates & Nolen in Atlanta, Georgia, presented a very interesting and enlightening program on National Trends in Domestic Relations Law. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 4:35 am by Edith Roberts
” A Daily Journal podcast features a discussion of this term’s second partisan-gerrymandering case, Benisek v. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 3:28 pm
WV&Z waits with bated breath for that case to commence. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 10:12 am by Larry Bodine
The ABA’s proposed actions will cause a chilling effect on a lawyer’s right to commercial free speech, first established In Bates v. [read post]
11 Oct 2006, 5:56 am
A class of hearing impaired applicants challenged these standards under the ADA.The Ninth Circuit, in Bates v. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 8:25 am
The specific New York law prohibiting such discrimination is Executive Law § 296(1)(a) which provides in part:It shall be an unlawful discriminatory practice for an employer * * * because of the disability * * * of any individual, to refuse to hire or employ or to bar or to discharge from employment such individual or to discriminate against such individual in compensation or in terms, conditions or privileges of employment.It is not easy to recover on an action commenced under… [read post]
11 May 2008, 1:14 pm
Until the 1977 Supreme Court decision in the case of Bates v. [read post]