Search for: "Best Products, Inc. v. Best Products Co., Inc"
Results 561 - 580
of 1,374
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2011, 7:02 am
Upjohn Co. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 8:39 am
" 44 Liquormart, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 6:17 pm
As the court explained: Notwithstanding the undeniable fact of corporate interrelationships (evidenced by, inter alia, the parties’ co-branded credit cards), products in these fields do not compete and do not serve the same purpose. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 12:27 pm
A recent drug bulk supplier case bears this out – and some unknown contract lawyer out there is probably feeling some heat because of it.The situation in Prestige Brands, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 6:59 pm
Phillips Petroleum Co., 339 U.S. 667, 671-72 (1950)); see also Speedco, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 8:36 am
Unfortunately, we don’t have great empirical studies to quantify the effects of moving a drug from a preferred tier (with little-to-no co-payment from patients) to a less-preferred tier (with a much more significant out-of-pocket obligation for the patient). [read post]
30 May 2011, 4:55 am
Limited v Werit UK Limited, Protechna SA (jiplp) PCC Page 28: Stretching tentacles – having designs on costs: Cautious Co and IPOff Ltd (PatLit) Court tells Kats, tail must not wag dog: EWCA (Civ) decision in Best Buy Co Inc and another v Worldwide Sales Corporation Espana SL. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
Fox Television Stations, Inc., 556 U. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 12:08 pm
First, in an amicus brief filed in opposition to a petition for certiorari in Gilead Sciences, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 11:17 am
IMS Health Inc.], 2653 (2011) 131 S. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 6:00 am
Lake County Grading Co. of Libertyville, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:31 pm
March 28, 1997) (reaffirming PTO 12 in light of Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 10:33 am
Rind Line Construction & Electric, Inc., 970 So.2d, 424,426 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007); Royal Sunalliance v. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 12:00 am
B-Roc Reps., Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) TTAB dismisses 2(d) opposition, finding BELL HILL for wine and BELL’S for beer too dissimilar: Bell's Brewery, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am
Apotex Inc. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 12:49 pm
Thys Co.) that barred any payment of royalties for use of a patented product or process after the patent had expired. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 12:24 pm
Sandoz, Inc., 699 F. [read post]
16 Mar 2019, 8:28 am
Liebensohn v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 3:46 pm
Co. v. [read post]
