Search for: "Blake v. State"
Results 561 - 580
of 929
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2011, 4:29 am
Martin’s argument is that under Blakely v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 2:24 am
The Panopticon blog has a post about the decision in W, X, Y and Z v Secretary of State for Health, Secretary of State for the Home Department and British Medical Association [2015] EWCA Civ 1034 concerning the sharing of medical information. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 7:17 pm
Cunningham (2007), which struck down part of the state’s sentencing scheme, was dictated by the Court’s ruling in Blakely v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:57 am
Earlier this year, the Fourth Circuit decided United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 1:00 am
The Divisional Court considered the construction of each policy wording and the FCA, the Appellant Insurers and the Hiscox Interveners appeal on a number of points On Monday 16 November, the Supreme Court will also hear the appeal of Robinson (Jamaica) v Secretary of State for Home Department. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 In the matter of XY (AP) (Scotland), heard 13- 14 November 2019 R v Hilton (Northern Ireland), heard 2 December 2019 MacDonald & Anor… [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 4:57 am
In the context of the current Jones v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm
United States The United States District Court for the Northern District of California issued its decision to grant the Center for Countering Digital Hate’s (CCDH) motion to strike out under an anti-SLAPP statute in the case of X CCDH. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:05 am
On 15 December 2023, as stated above, Fancourt J handed down judgement in favour of the claimants in the case of The Duke of Sussex and Ors v MGN Limited [2023] EWHC 3217 (Ch). [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 5:09 pm
The Herald has also used the case to analyse the state of Australia as a jurisdiction for defamation litigation. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 1:45 am
On Wednesday 8 November 2023, there was a remote hearing in the case of Blake and others v Fox QB-2021-001248. [read post]
7 Jun 2008, 2:56 am
Maryland and United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 5:01 am
A scenario similar to Bullcoming’s was presented in Ohio in State v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 2:07 am
R (on the application of Pathan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12 December 2019. [read post]
27 Jan 2007, 2:23 pm
Ct. at 1381, quoting United States v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 3:00 pm
” (Named after the landmark 1971 Florida Supreme Court case of Richardson v. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 1:41 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Vedanta Resources Plc & Anor v Lungowe & Ors, heard 15-16 Jan 2019 Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Ors v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, heard 27 June 2019 Unwired Planet International Ltd & Anor… [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 11:00 am
Washington, 542 U.S. 295 (2004) andUnited States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 10:01 am
Two people were killed last night protesting the police shooting of Jacob Blake, reports The New York Times. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 6:35 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Vedanta Resources Plc & Anor v Lungowe & Ors, heard 15-16 Jan 2019 Sevilleja v Marex Financial Ltd, heard 8 May 2019 Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Ors v Commissioners of Inland… [read post]
