Search for: "Blue v. United States" Results 561 - 580 of 1,630
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2007, 9:24 am
First, they moved to exclude any reference at trial to the message on Lischner's sign, or the person at whom it was theoretically directed -- the President of the United States. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 1:49 pm by Susan Brenner
After being charged with conspiring to import 500 grams or more of cocaine into the United States in violation of 21 U.S. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 12:55 am by Lawrence Solum
Part II provides a brief history of Sunday closing laws in the United States. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 6:39 pm
The United States in 2007 in which the court ruled that judges could sentence crack cocaine offenders below the sentencing guidelines. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Supreme Court’s decision in Puerto Rico v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 9:02 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> State of Veracruz v. [read post]
19 May 2022, 5:01 am by Steve Floyd
But the Blue Nile also presents the potential for abundant hydroelectric power. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 3:59 pm by Michael Fox
On Saturday, Justice Sonia Sotomayor will become the third female and first Hispanic justice of the United States Supreme Court following today's 61-38 roll call vote in the Senate. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 6:11 am by Chris Wesner
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON In re: GYPC, INC., Debtor Case No. 17‐31030 Adv. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 10:03 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: Front Pages   PDFArticle How the New Deal Became a Raw Deal for Indian Nations: Justice Stanley Reed and the Tee-Hit-Ton Decision on Indian Title – Kent McNeil   PDF Comments Keeping Cultural Bias Out of the Courtroom: How ICWA “Qualified Expert Witnesses” Make a Difference – Elizabeth Low   PDF Being Uighur . . . with “Chinese Characteristics”: Analyzing China’s Legal Crusade Against… [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 2:03 pm by John Stigi
In 2018, the Supreme Court of the United States held that state courts continue to have concurrent jurisdiction over claims by private plaintiffs and that defendants cannot remove actions filed in state court to federal court. [read post]