Search for: "Booth v. Booth" Results 561 - 580 of 830
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2011, 8:41 am by admin
In a recent domain name dispute decision, Party Booths, LLC v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 1:48 am by elemembers
Case reference: Garside and Laycock Ltd v Mr T G Booth It is easy to see why Garside and Laycock took the decision to make their employees accept a pay cut rather than make them redundant since it is a cheaper and less unpleasant and disruptive process. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 1:48 am by elemembers
Case reference: Garside and Laycock Ltd v Mr T G Booth It is easy to see why Garside and Laycock took the decision to make their employees accept a pay cut rather than make them redundant since it is a cheaper and less unpleasant and disruptive process. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 7:10 am
v=d8CAKAXR-AMAfter that, it was back to the convention center for the exhibits. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 7:10 am
v=d8CAKAXR-AMAfter that, it was back to the convention center for the exhibits. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 7:10 am
v=d8CAKAXR-AMAfter that, it was back to the convention center for the exhibits. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 11:30 pm by Michael Scutt
However, varying an employee’s contract of employment can be fraught with risk, as was demonstrated in Garside v Laycock & Booth UKEAT/0003/11/CEA Mr Garside refused to take a 5% paycut when his employers decided they needed to become more profitable. [read post]