Search for: "Brandes v. United States" Results 561 - 580 of 2,961
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2019, 5:03 am by Stephanie Zable
The complaint argues that the NDAA deprives Huawei of the liberty to sell to federal agencies, as well as by stigmatizing it and “discouraging other entities across the United States from doing business with Huawei. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 2:08 am by Florian Mueller
That fair use JMOL is grossly consistent with the entire body of fair use case law in the United States concerning transformative use and the impact of a derivative work on the original creator. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 11:00 pm by Dennis Crouch
And it now is grown by more than 90 percent of the 275,000 soybean farms in the United States. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 3:18 am
The United States District Court for the District of South Carolina recently had occasion to apply the test in Power Beverages v. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
The Austin-based federal Western District Court for Texas “finds the United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 9:36 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Apr. 23, 2024) Hetronic has US registrations; Abitron sold Hetronic-branded products without permission to customers around the world, including in the United States. [read post]
25 May 2010, 4:58 am by Bexis
Yesterday, the Supreme Court granted cert. in Williamson v.. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 5:38 am by Stephanie Figueroa
§602(a)(1), allowed it to block importation of the wristwatches because it had not authorized those watches to be sold in the United States. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 9:00 pm by Dean Falvy
As Election Day turns into Election Night, do you worry about a similar scenario playing out in the United States? [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
June. 13, 2013), holding essentially that, since those meanies on the United States Supreme Court aren’t letting plaintiffs sue generic manufacturers, we’ll change Alabama common law and let them sue someone else. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
United States and United States v. [read post]