Search for: "Brown v. Johnson*" Results 561 - 580 of 844
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
I instead came away with the impression that the historian George Brown Tindall was correct to conclude that during the 1920s southern apartheid “was settled. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am by Legal Beagle
”Latest Court of Session opinion on Heather Capital, published 28 February 2017: EXTRA DIVISION, INNER HOUSE, COURT OF SESSION[2017] CSIH 19 CA207/14 and CA208/14 Lady Paton Lady Clark of Calton Lord Glennie OPINION OF LADY PATON in the cause HEATHER CAPITAL LIMITED (in liquidation) and PAUL DUFFY (as liquidator) Pursuer and Reclaimer against LEVY & McRAE and others Defenders and Respondents and HEATHER CAPITAL LIMITED (in liquidation) and PAUL DUFFY (as liquidator) Pursuer… [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:08 am by John Elwood
United States, 18-6177, and Browning v. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 8:00 am
" [emphasis added by LawPundit]In supporting Justice McKenna and in not supporting Justice Harlan, Epstein is as wrong as those who supported Justice Henry Billings Brown (who never earned a law degree) in Plessy v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 6:58 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented from the denial of certiorari in Davis v. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 1:29 am by INFORRM
Recent Judgments On 1 July 2022 Collins Rice J handed down judgment in the case of Lee v Brown [2022] EWHC 1699 (QB). [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 12:16 pm
Brown, 1486, 3986/06, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, 2009 NY Slip Op 8462; 2009 N.Y. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 1:28 pm by John Elwood
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan, filed an opinion dissenting from the denial of certiorari, arguing that the U.S. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 4:40 pm by Tom Goldstein
Brown Docket: 08-559 Argument date: Unclear whether the case will be set for argument Question presented: A defendant can attempt to prove that his conviction was unconstitutional because there was not enough evidence to convict. [read post]