Search for: "C. G., Matter of" Results 561 - 580 of 3,571
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The ground for opposition under A 100(c) therefore does not prejudice the maintenance of a European patent which includes such a feature. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The decision was based on the request filed on October 31.The Board of appeal found that the applicant’s right to be heard had been violated:Fundamental deficiencies[3] The appellant contests the decision of the ED essentially for both procedural and substantive matters. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Prokop, who in 2008 was working for Kennametal Technologies and involved in matters relating to inventions in the Kennametal group. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 1:00 pm
 In differing from A-G Jacobs, A-G Sharpston observed that the notice requirement did not have any Treaty basis and was rationalized merely as a procedural requirement. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
In this case the patent was opposed on the grounds based on A 100(a), (b) and (c). [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
The Third Circuit also noted that: Were the debtor facing “serious financial and/or managerial difficulties at the time of filing,” the result may have been different.[16] Thus, there are two critical takeaways from LTL Mgmt: (1) a showing of financial distress is a necessity, no matter what the Texas Two-Step (or other statutes) say, and (2) the debtor who shows specific “financial or managerial difficulties” may be able to satisfy this burden. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 8:51 pm
(C) Conducting targeted counter-terrorism operations [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 2:15 am by Laura Sandwell
In the matter of Peacock, heard 14 December 2011. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 9:30 pm by ernst
" More CRT, ICYMI:  Linda C. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 7:12 pm by Ben Allen
§ 922(g), Cooper moved to suppress the gun seized during the sweep. [read post]