Search for: "C. G., Matter of"
Results 561 - 580
of 3,607
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2025, 6:00 am
Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 180; see Matter of Ciganik v New York City Off. of Admin. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 8:28 am
Matter of Estate of Baker, 297 N.J. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 9:04 pm
Subject areas might include (a) History and Theory of International Law, (b) Law of Armed Conflict (IHL), (c) International Organizations, (d) Dispute Settlement, (e) Law of the Sea, (f) Law of Environment, (g) Human Rights, (h) International Criminal Law, (i) Law of Development, (j) International Economic Law, (k) Private International Law (Conflict of Laws). [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 6:02 am
c. [read post]
18 Aug 2012, 3:42 pm
Exhibit C is an affidavit from the grandson of the plaintiff. [read post]
16 May 2012, 5:01 pm
In example 24, treatment was carried out at 55°C for 5 minutes 3.9 mmole NaOH/g resin, peak pH 10.3 which resulted in hardly any loss of AZE with a percentage of 41, a percentage ACH of <2 and an undetectable amount of AOX. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 3:36 pm
IN THE MATTER OF I.L., C.L. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 5:01 pm
The ground for opposition under A 100(c) therefore does not prejudice the maintenance of a European patent which includes such a feature. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 2:49 am
Magistrate Judge James C. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 3:01 pm
In this case the patent was opposed on the grounds based on A 100(a), (b) and (c). [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm
The Third Circuit also noted that: Were the debtor facing “serious financial and/or managerial difficulties at the time of filing,” the result may have been different.[16] Thus, there are two critical takeaways from LTL Mgmt: (1) a showing of financial distress is a necessity, no matter what the Texas Two-Step (or other statutes) say, and (2) the debtor who shows specific “financial or managerial difficulties” may be able to satisfy this burden. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 6:01 pm
Ousset (rapporteur) and C. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 10:16 am
C-34, see Practice Note, Canadian Bid-Rigging Law. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
The decision was based on the request filed on October 31.The Board of appeal found that the applicant’s right to be heard had been violated:Fundamental deficiencies[3] The appellant contests the decision of the ED essentially for both procedural and substantive matters. [read post]
12 May 2020, 11:20 am
C. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 8:51 pm
(C) Conducting targeted counter-terrorism operations [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 7:00 am
., 788 F.3d 1371, reh’g en banc denied, 809 F.3d 1282 (Fed. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 5:01 pm
Prokop, who in 2008 was working for Kennametal Technologies and involved in matters relating to inventions in the Kennametal group. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 1:00 pm
In differing from A-G Jacobs, A-G Sharpston observed that the notice requirement did not have any Treaty basis and was rationalized merely as a procedural requirement. [read post]
