Search for: "C. v. C."
Results 561 - 580
of 56,836
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2014, 2:57 am
The post In the Supreme Court w/c 10 February 2014 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 7:43 am
Inc. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 6:19 am
From the American Immigration Council, "This Practice Advisory describes the Supreme Court’s decision in Judulang v. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 6:57 am
¿Qué de aquellos casos en que la víctima mantiene silencio, pero se desprende del contexto que no lo hay? [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 3:19 am
Payment of hazardous duty pay while receiving GML Section 207-c benefitsTown of Carmel v PERB, Appellate Division, 246 A.D.2d 791Prior to January 1995, Town of Carmel police officers assigned to “light duty” pursuant to Section 207-c of the General Municipal Law performed desk duty. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 8:52 pm
William C. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 6:50 pm
C. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 4:42 am
Donald C. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 11:54 am
In two cases decided on December 19, 2016, United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 9:55 am
Benjamin Hall v. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 9:24 am
§ 924(c), even after United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 2:54 am
The post In the Supreme Court w/c 27 January 2014 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 2:37 am
Jayasinghe v Liyanage Chancery Division “The function of the adjudicator to the Land Registry in relation to the entry of a restriction was not limited to determining whether the applicant had demonstrated an arguable claim within the meaning of section 42(1)(c) of the Land Registration Act 2002. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 7:30 am
We covered earlier the cert. grant in Krupski v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 12:36 pm
C. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 2:00 am
Commune de Sausheim v Azelvandre (Case C-552/07); [2009] WLR (D) 64 “The national authorities could not rely on the protection of public order or other interests in order to oppose the disclosure of information on the location of the release of GMOs into the environment. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 2:33 am
Essex Trading Standards v Singh; [2009] WLR (D) 81 “In order to acquit a defendant of a charge of unauthorised use of registered trade marks in relation to goods, contrary to s 92(1)(c) of the Trade Marks Act 1994, under the statutory defence provided by s 92(5) of the Act, it was not enough for the [...] [read post]
18 Dec 2010, 2:13 pm
I've been working on a summary of FCC v. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 12:27 pm
” Richie v. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 1:30 pm
La presidenta de la Comisión de lo Jurídico de la Cámara de Representantes, María Milagros Charbonier, puntualizó a través de Microjuris.com que la decisión del Tribunal Supremo de Estados Unidos (TSEU) en Bostock v. [read post]
