Search for: "C.A." Results 561 - 580 of 5,795
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2017, 9:00 am by Edward M. McNally
Neupert, C.A. 2017-0290-VCL (December 6, 2017) The conspiracy theory of jurisdiction developed in the Istituto Bancario decision is often misunderstood, for good reasons. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 11:19 am by Steve Bainbridge
Silva, C.A. 3932-VCN (September 5, 2014), which poses some great questions: This case presents a number of perplexing factual questions. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 9:00 am by Edward M. McNally
., C.A. 12651-VCS (February 2, 2017) It is not enough that certain forward-looking statements failed to come true to justify requiring an inspection of corporate records. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 10:21 am by Edward M. McNally
Blum, C.A. 4516-VCP (February 24, 2010) It is well known that an LLC agreement may limit the right to sue for breaches of fiduciary duty. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 2:27 pm by Edward M. McNally
Bengoa, C.A. 3598-VCL (August 13, 2010) This is an interesting decision for its explanation of the criteria the Court will consider in reviewing a fee application. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 4:21 pm by Edward M. McNally
Purches, C.A. 7199-VCG (October 1, 2012) This is a classic example of what not to say in an argument unless you want to get the Court mad. [read post]
14 May 2013, 1:15 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Edward McNally notes an interesting new Delaware Chancery Court decision: In re Plains Exploration & Production Company Stockholder Litigation, C.A. 8090-VCN (May 9, 2013) As this decision points... [[ This is a content summary only. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 1:33 pm by Edward M. McNally
Bengoa, C.A. 3598-VCL (December 24, 2009) After the entry of an order compelling arbitration, the defendant delayed the arbitration and even sought to re-litigate the underlying suit compelling arbitration. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 8:17 am by Edward M. McNally
Wood, C.A. 6526-VCG (July 12, 2012) A plaintiff must offer some basis to believe the defendant is subject to the Court's jurisdiction before he will be permitted to take jurisdictional discovery. [read post]