Search for: "CALIFORNIA COMPANY v. STATE INDUSTRIAL COURT"
Results 561 - 580
of 2,377
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2020, 1:00 pm
In Snyder v. [read post]
3 Dec 2017, 7:00 am
" The State sought to vacate the award, and the Commonwealth Court granted that request. [read post]
3 Dec 2017, 7:00 am
" The State sought to vacate the award, and the Commonwealth Court granted that request. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 3:00 am
The negligent hiring case discussed below was decided under California law, and therefore is not binding in other states. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 10:14 am
So then what is going on in California with these Countrywide Financial cases? [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 12:58 pm
” More importantly, citing the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 10:23 am
Plaintiff Christopher Walkowiak began working for a special effects company in the movie industry in 1994. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 6:47 am
Perry, the case involving a challenge to California’s Proposition 8 banning gay marriage, or United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 2:00 am
In People v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 8:36 am
(see, e.g., Playboy v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 6:57 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California sentenced defendant Walter Liew to 15 years in prison for misappropriating trade secrets from chemical giant DuPont and selling them to an overseas Chinese company known as the Pangang Group, based in Chengdu. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 2:47 am
Superior Court of California, 480 U.S. 102 (1987). [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 8:03 am
Samsung, 971 F.2d 1395, 1397 (9th Cir. 1992)) New York only has one system of Right of Publicity law.[5][6] The NY statutory regime supports a right of publicity, yet the New York Court of Appeals has held that there is no common law right of publicity in Stephano v. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 8:03 am
Samsung, 971 F.2d 1395, 1397 (9th Cir. 1992)) New York only has one system of Right of Publicity law.[5][6] The NY statutory regime supports a right of publicity, yet the New York Court of Appeals has held that there is no common law right of publicity in Stephano v. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 4:00 am
State of California, No. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 9:07 pm
The Appellate Court reversed, relying on Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 9:36 am
Brazil v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:15 am
Co. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 8:00 am
Emanuele Secci v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 11:03 am
District Court for Central California, Los Angeles.Fox claims their ability to name the show EMPIRE is protected by the First Amendment, ie, freedom of expression. [read post]
