Search for: "CAMPBELL v CAMPBELL"
Results 561 - 580
of 3,320
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
[We're moving this up, because we've received an updated version of the program. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 2:05 pm
The majority relied heavily on State v. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 11:04 am
The family was described and close-knit, caring and devoted. $20,000 each Campbell J refers to this award as “the high end of the conventional range of family law awards” (at para 309). [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 3:03 am
Royal Courts of Justice Author David Castor Reproduced pursuant to CCO 1.0 Source Wikipedia Royal Courts of Justice Jane Lambert Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (Mr Recorder Campbell QC) NXP BV v ID Management Systems [2019] EWHC 1902 (IPEC) (31 July 2019) This was an action for trade mark infringement. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
State v. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 2:00 am
In the series premier of The Boys, A-Train—while high as a kite on a drug called Compound V that has steroid-like effects—accidently runs through Hughie Campbell’s girlfriend, Robin. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 11:45 am
Case citation: Campbell v. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 10:36 am
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In his opinion in Campbell v. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 11:03 am
Campbell, Timothy D. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 7:55 am
A previous Slaw article (which you can read here) discussed the recent British Columbia Court of Appeal decision that confirmed that the stringent test set out in Health Sciences Assoc of BC v Campbell River and North Island Transition Society (Campbell River) to determine if there was a duty to accommodate based on family status and if there is a prima facie case of discrimination based on family status, continues to be the applicable test in British Columbia. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 4:00 am
In R v McKenzie, a 2015 case from the Ontario Superior Court, Campbell J crafted a procedure for determining whether the prosecution had edited too much information from an ITO. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 9:44 am
(v) Consent may be revoked or withdrawn any time before or during the act of sexual penetration, oral sex, or sexual contact. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 11:57 am
Campbell and Timothy D. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 8:38 am
Great Minds v. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 9:12 am
A recent British Columbia Court of Appeal decision confirmed that the stringent test set out in Health Sciences Assoc of BC v Campbell River and North Island Transition Society (B.C.C.A., 2004 “Campbell River“) to determine if there was a duty to accommodate based on family status and if there is a prima facie case of discrimination based on family status, continues to be the applicable test in British Columbia. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 12:30 am
Claridge's Hotel Author Tim Westcott Licence CC BY-SA 2.0 Source Wikipedia Claridge's Jane Lambert Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (Mr Recorder Campbell) Claridge's Hotel Ltd v Claridge Candles Ltd and Another [2019] EWHC 2003 (IPEC) This was an action for trade mark infringement and passing off. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 4:59 pm
Lord Bannatyne’s judgment affirms, for the first time, that Scottish common law recognizes a right to privacy which is on all fours with the right recognised in England and Wales since Campbell v MGN [2004] 2 AC 457 [126]. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 4:46 pm
Campbell, Timothy D. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 10:21 am
Although the judge was circumspect in his comments on this point, the judgment makes clear that he would have weighed the point as part of the balancing exercise (step (v)) if it came to it.CommentMr Campbell QC produced a clear-eyed judgment on a rather blurred application. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 9:46 am
Unauthorised sampling - the CJEU adds some clarityThe core issue in this all important case between the German electronic music pioneers Kraftwerk and and hip-hop producers Moses Pelham and Martin Haas in 1999 over the Sabrina Setlur song “Nur Mir”, which revolves around thse sample a two-second snippet of Kratfwerk's “Metall auf Metall” used as a loop was whether a license is required for sampling and could non-pursual of the same violate the phonogram producers rights?… [read post]
