Search for: "CONFIDENTIAL INFORMANT v. US "
Results 561 - 580
of 7,782
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2023, 6:03 am
The failure to provide the Court with this specific information weighs against B.L.'s claim of confidentiality. [read post]
11 Feb 2023, 5:14 am
The MINAE also held that the information deemed confidential could be used by third parties with fraudulent purposes or be misinterpreted. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 7:51 pm
Ltd. and Others v. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 10:28 am
Some states go further by granting protection to confidential information that are not trade secrets. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 7:57 am
The source that was credited in those tweets--an EU antitrust lawyer who uses the "Idas" pseudonym to comment on a discussion board for gamers--normally provides accurate information about the Microsoft-ActivisionBlizzard merger reviews around the globe, but in this case he was wrong: his misconception presumably was that he saw the ALJ's order granting the third motion for an extension, but that one had been agreed upon between Sony and Microsoft, and the question… [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 3:33 pm
In United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 8:19 am
Federal Trade Comm’n v. [read post]
5 Feb 2023, 10:50 pm
In PayPal, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2023, 3:10 pm
In Société Nationale Industrielle Aérospatiale v. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 5:01 am
” By this point, Texas v. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 3:59 am
Gossman and Gordon V. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 6:25 am
Cir.) -- reversing and remanding district court’s decision and concluding that: (1) agency failed to establish that the names of companies that supply the government with a drug used for lethal injections qualify as “commercial” information under Exemption 4; and (2) agency failed to show how certain “key contract terms” were “confidential” under Exemption 4.Sherven v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 11:00 pm
In the case of Puricelli v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 11:33 am
Cameron v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 10:19 am
The information was therefore "genuinely commercially confidential" and "disclosure...could prejudice Oxford or a third party". [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 7:46 am
Valuable confidential business or professional information that otherwise does not qualify as trade secrets. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 12:49 am
Final thoughtsWhen running a clinical trial, preventing the accidental disclosure of confidential information can be an uphill battle. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 10:07 am
The case, Ebin New York, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 9:49 am
Europe has a fraught history with use of personal information, and in particular the use of information about race, religion, and personal and real property ownership. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 9:05 pm
Second, this suggestion that confidential information must amount to “stock in trade” (or at least have independent economic value to the holder of the information) will likely be used as a defense in the future by insiders in private corporations. [read post]
