Search for: "CROSS v. COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA"
Results 561 - 580
of 1,765
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2016, 6:56 am
Xcentric appeal. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 10:27 am
The District Court for the Central District of California answered that question recently with its holding in Skinner v. [read post]
10 May 2023, 2:30 pm
Waters, decided today by the California Court of Appeal, in an opinion by Justice John Wiley, joined by Justices Grimes and Viramontes: In 2020, challenger Joe E. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 5:00 pm
” Id. at 661 Accordingly, the Court of Appeals held that because the lower Court’s ruling was not clearly erroneous, they would not disturb it on appeal. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
Motorola "Posner (cross-)appeal", and there is still no ruling. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 8:00 am
Weitz, the general contractor, appealed the order and the Colorado Court of Appeals affirmed the district court’s ruling.In coming to its decision, the Colorado Court of Appeals found persuasive an analysis of the ISO’s history of drafting the additional insured endorsement (CG 20 10 1993) in another case. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 8:51 am
The decisions of the courts of appeals to the contrary are overruled. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 1:20 pm
At five points, however, the new rail line would cross gas pipelines owned by the Southern California Gas Company (Gas Company). [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 11:00 pm
(Campos v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 5:45 am
The court held, reversing the court of appeals, ___ N.C. [read post]
5 May 2008, 3:28 pm
Griffith, the Court of Appeal (Fourth Appellate District, Division Three) offers some additional guidance on the concept. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 11:43 am
Social Media Accounts: The appeals court observes that the district court did not grapple with the merits of JLM’s conversion and trespass to chattels claims but nevertheless granted an injunction that essentially transferred ownership over the accounts to JLM. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 4:02 pm
Relying on the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (Civil Code § 1633.1 et seq.) the California Court of Appeals rejected this position and held that no physical signature was necessary. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 3:15 pm
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the NLRA preemption case of Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 9:45 am
Supreme Court's decisions in BMW v. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 2:48 pm
As a result, the California State Court of Appeals reversed the conviction against Mr. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 5:44 am
Appeal of Apple v. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 11:35 am
So it may be with the Fourth District Court of Appeal’s 43-page, published, 2-1 majority decision, accompanied by a 4-page dissent, filed on November 16, 2017, after remand from the California Supreme Court in Cleveland National Forest Foundation, et al. v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 8:45 pm
Electric Co. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 12:49 pm
October 3, 2008) (unpublished)-Review granted and case summarily remanded to the Court of Appeals in light of State v. [read post]
