Search for: "CWA"
Results 561 - 580
of 1,060
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2013, 1:38 pm
EPA based on EPA's alleged failure to promptly promulgate revisions to certain effluent limitations and effluent limitations guidelines under the Clean Water Act (CWA). [read post]
16 May 2013, 12:48 pm
Four environmental groups (collectively, the Environmental Coalition) commenced this action to challenge the fill permit issued under CWA § 404. [read post]
1 May 2013, 2:06 pm
The 8-page document is available here under the "New" category (ACWA White Paper: CWA Compliance Innovations 4-24-13). [read post]
1 May 2013, 1:49 pm
Bills have been introduced in the 113th Congress to clarify or restrict EPA’s authority to veto CWA permits issued by the Corps (H.R. 524 and S. 830). [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 2:00 pm
Failing these regulatory prerequisites, the Corps leaves us with nothing more than its say-so that it meets CWA and NEPA standards. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 7:44 am
Doing so in the CWA context, said the Court, reads out the term navigable -- and in the Boston bomber case, I wonder if using the statutory definition reads out the "mass" from WMD. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 10:18 am
First, the CWA does not specifically identify utility poles as point sources, nor has the EPA issued any guidance that utility poles are point sources. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 9:35 am
In the CWA part of the case, ERF argues that utility poles are themselves "conveyances." [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 7:44 am
In both cases, the issues involve Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations about Clean Water Act (CWA) requirements. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 7:44 am
In both cases, the issues involve Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations about Clean Water Act (CWA) requirements. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 1:28 pm
The League disagreed, viewing the letters as contradicting both the Clean Water Act (CWA) and the EPA's lawfully promulgated regulations. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 12:43 pm
Does the CWA allow NEDC to file this case in a Federal district court 30 years after the Silvicultural Rule became final? [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 12:43 pm
Does the CWA allow NEDC to file this case in a Federal district court 30 years after the Silvicultural Rule became final? [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 7:22 am
Failure to comply with the CWA's sixty-day notice requirement bars such an action and calls for dismissal of the suit. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 1:22 pm
For point sources of pollution, such as a pipe from a sewer treatment plant, CWA requires new or renewed permits to be consistent with the TMDL. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 2:24 pm
EPA can potentially address atmospheric deposition through the CWA and the CAA, but concerns have been raised about its ability to do so. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 11:24 am
The 112th Congress was interested in apparent overlap between FIFRA and the Clean Water Act (CWA). [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 8:47 am
Based on those allegations, a federal jury convicted Tuma on 3 counts of violating the CWA, 1 count of conspiracy to violate the CWA, and 1 count of obstructing justice with respect to the EPA’s inspection of the Arkla facility. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 12:42 pm
Plaintiff Center for Biological Diversity (CBD) appeals from the district court's dismissal of its action brought under the citizen-suit provisions of the Clean Water Act (CWA), the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), and the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA). [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 9:45 am
. __ (2013) By James Rusk The flow of polluted water from a concrete-lined portion of a river into a downstream portion of the same river does not involve a “discharge” for purposes of the Clean Water Act (“CWA”) and thus involves no CWA violation, the Supreme Court held in an opinion filed January 8. [read post]
