Search for: "Cal State Los Angeles" Results 561 - 580 of 1,525
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
On the heels of Los Angeles’s adoption of “Ban-the-Box,” this year’s attempt at even stronger, state-wide “Ban the Box” legislation marches on. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 6:31 pm by David M. Boertje
Xavier Becerra unveiled a 15-count felony complaint against the activists, alleging that they video-recorded 14 people without their consent at meetings with women’s healthcare providers in Los Angeles, Pasadena, San Francisco and El Dorado. [read post]
23 May 2017, 6:38 am by Chris Castle
Steve Winogradsky is a senior music lawyer and co-proprietor of the music services company Winogradsky/Sobel in Los Angeles. [read post]
11 May 2017, 8:00 am by Daniel Perlman
The sooner a Los Angeles white collar crimes defense attorney can get involved in a white collar case, the better. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 1:54 pm
City of Los Angeles (1967) 67 Cal.2d 297, 305 (Driscoll); see Orr v. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 9:31 am by Chris Castle
 All the students at schools like Cal State Chico, NYU, American, Georgetown, Syracuse and Temple. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 12:55 pm
City of Los Angeles (1970) 3 Cal.3d 252, 262 (Sanders).)We have recognized that an employee who brings a successful mandamus action to recover wrongfully withheld salary payments may satisfy the requirements of section 3287(a). [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 6:00 am by Kit Case
Many lived in Southern California, particularly in Los Angeles, Riverside and San Bernardino counties. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 3:09 pm
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (2000) 23 Cal.4th 305, 315-316 (Kajima): In denying recovery against a government entity for lost profits under a promissory estoppel theory, Kajima stated:  “Because the public entity was authorized to reject all bids, the plaintiff did not know at the time its bid was submitted whether the contract would even be awarded. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 9:04 am by Beth Graham
CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLC, the California Supreme Court held that where “an employment agreement compels the waiver of representative claims,” whether or not the agreement specifically references PAGA, it “frustrates the PAGA’s objectives” and “is contrary to public policy and unenforceable as a matter of state law. [read post]