Search for: "California Company v. Price"
Results 561 - 580
of 1,498
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2013, 5:57 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California denying Apple’s request for a permanent injunction against Sam- sung Electronics Company, Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”). [read post]
9 May 2016, 4:19 am
Tonkovic, J.D.The district court sitting in California's Northern District has sent yet another case alleging only claims under the Securities Act back to the state court from which it originated. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 2:01 pm
City of Sacramento, California v. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 11:24 am
Another VLSI v. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 11:50 am
, Haney v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 8:17 am
The appellate court held that California’s Civil Code section 2527(c), which requires mining companies to disclose pharmacy data (and, in particular, prices charged to private customers) to third-party payers, is lawful under the First Amendment. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 6:25 am
” Lawyers v. [read post]
14 May 2023, 7:07 pm
(Yu v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 12:54 pm
For example, in Nichols v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 9:07 pm
In the case of Daimler/Chrysler AG v. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 9:00 am
First up: companies that allegedly have tried to circumvent uncertainty over noncompetes -- particularly in California -- by agreeing amongst themselves not to recruit each others' employees. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 7:26 am
In Rehberg v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 1:55 pm
According to the complaint, following these disclosures, the company’s share price declined over 8%. [read post]
6 May 2010, 11:07 am
Franklin Mint Company v. [read post]
22 May 2022, 8:33 am
” The complaint alleges that the company’s share price declined almost 11% on the “aftermarket update and Raymond James downgrade. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 7:30 am
Kolon case and how to use, or avoid, it in your trade secret case" – Griffith Price of Finnegan’s Washington, D.C. office; "Litigating Trade Secret Cases before the ITC – The future of TianRui Group v. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 8:45 am
(The case is EEOC v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 12:50 pm
” Id.Both Currier and Adams cite another California case, Blanco v. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 6:48 am
On this news, the Company’s share price fell $8.99, or nearly 52%, to close at $8.31 per share on August 8, 2019, on unusually heavy trading volume. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 6:30 am
Van de Kamp v. [read post]
