Search for: "California Employment Law Letter" Results 561 - 580 of 2,236
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2011, 9:30 pm by Brian Tamanaha
It is by now well known that law schools have been posting misleading employment numbers. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 11:09 am
  Under California law, when an employee terminates employment with his/her employer, the employer is required to pay the employee all wages owed at the time of such termination, which includes any Vacation Benefits. [read post]
9 May 2018, 11:09 am by Guest Author
Following an extensive analysis of California case law on the legal test for determining whether a worker is an employee or, instead, an independent contractor, the Supreme Court held that is was appropriate for employers to look to a standard commonly referred to as the “ABC test,” that is utilized in other jurisdictions. [read post]
So because the CFRA has a mandatory written policy requirement for employers doing business in California, all covered employers should implement an updated CFRA/FMLA or new CFRA policy and any associated notification letters and designation forms. [read post]
23 May 2011, 3:40 pm
In arriving at its conclusion, the Court noted that the DLSE Enforcement and Interpretations Manual was entitled to no deference beyond the persuasive logic embodied in its construction of California employment law because its promulgation did not conform with the Administrative Procedures Act. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 2:00 am by Julie Adams, FordHarrison
What do beauty pageant winners, professional athletes, and employment law have in common? [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 11:02 pm by Anthony Primelo
The post ARB Upholds “Reasonable Belief” Standard for Fraud Claims Under SOX appeared first on Employment Law Group. [read post]
17 May 2021, 12:19 pm by Stephen M. Fuerch
As the appeals court put it, the law should never be interpreted such that a “plaintiff’s misdescription of an employer’s proper legal name on a DFEH complaint [serves] to provide a ‘get-out-jail-free card’ to the employer under California anti-discrimination law. [read post]
1 May 2020, 3:10 pm by Michael Thompson
The post Recent appellate decision offers important lessons on retaliation, workplace investigations appeared first on California Employment Law Report. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 9:18 am by James Dale
  In its opinion, the Idaho Supreme Court adopted the analysis from a California appellate opinion, Cotran v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 9:18 am by James Dale
  In its opinion, the Idaho Supreme Court adopted the analysis from a California appellate opinion, Cotran v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 12:15 pm by Renae Lloyd
“Selling Away” The White Law Group is investigating what liability that Rideaux’s former employers may have for his actions. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 6:55 am by Michael Correll and Michael Lombardino
Also keep in mind the laws in some states (e.g., California and Pennsylvania) do not allow employers to use the FWW method to satisfy the state’s overtime requirements. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 9:00 am by Ellen D. Marcus
The WSJ reported on a hearing last week organized by the EEOC on whether the use of social media by employees, job seekers and employers raises new issues for employment discrimination laws. [read post]
23 Nov 2013, 12:45 pm by HR Hero
For more information about the new OFCCP rules, check out California Employment Law Letter editor Mark Schickman’s analysis, “A new affirmative action obligation. [read post]
16 Sep 2023, 3:33 pm by John Caiozzo
This important law holds a provision that modifies the original California Fair Employment and Housing Act’s language regarding reproductive health decision-making.Aside from making it illegal for an employer to discriminate against current employees for reproductive health decisions, SB 523 also makes it illegal to discriminate against job applicants for such decisions.Dig deep into the letter of the law, and you’ll find that this… [read post]