Search for: "California v. Superior Court" Results 561 - 580 of 5,746
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2008, 3:04 am
The Superior Court of Los Angeles, the case examining the circumstances under which parents can homeschool their children, will be re-argued in the... [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 6:00 am
Superior Court (Sjobring), ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (Jan. 25, 2006) (see my original post here), and came across this paragraph: California law is clear that a representative plaintiff must be a member of the class he seeks to represent. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 8:00 am by Steven G. Pearl
The district court dismissed all of her claims against defendant Terry Hill (the former Chief Medical Officer for the Receiver of the California prison medical care system) and remanded the remainder of her state law claims to the superior court. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 8:48 am
The regional center and the California Department of Developmental Services (DDS), which have the responsibility for providing services for people with developmental disabilities, disagreed with the court’s adjudication and concluded that Medina did not have a developmental disability. [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 4:25 pm
See's Candy Shops, Inc. v The Superior Court of San Diego County, D060710, CA Court of Appeal (Oct. 29, 2012). [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 10:00 am by Grace Feldman
The California Court of Appeal ruled yesterday in People v. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 2:27 pm
  The answer, by the way, is:  "Yes, there is personal jurisdiction here since the defendant is deliberately 'targeting' a California resident. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 2:32 pm
The 2nd District Court of Appeal recently affirmed a ruling by Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Jane Johnson in Perez v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 3:00 am by Liz Dunshee
Here’s the intro from this Allen Matkins blog: California Superior Court Judge Maureen Duffy-Lewis issued her ruling on September 28th on the parties’ respective motions for summary judgment in Crest v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 11:01 pm by Graham Donath
Superior Court (Romero), 13 Cal.4th 497, the California Supreme Court held that a Superior Court Judge could strike an allegation or vacate a finding under the Three Strikes law if they saw fit to do so in the interests of justice. [read post]