Search for: "Campbell v. United States"
Results 561 - 580
of 874
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2011, 7:59 am
Plaintiff United States asserts that the exclusionary rule should not be applied to the evidence obtained from the federal search warrant based upon Herring v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 5:07 pm
Relying on Matter of Campbell v Pesce (60 NY2d 165), the Court held thatAlthough the constitutional Double Jeopardy Clauses do not bar a second prosecution where the prior judgment of conviction has been vacated upon the defendant's motion or appeal because of an error in the proceedings (see Lockhart v Nelson, 488 US 33, 38; United States v Tateo, 377 US 463, 465-467), the 2003 judgment of conviction has never been vacated. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 1:50 am
The Eleventh Circuit quickly disposed of Campbell’s argument that the award was not taxable because, as “assignee of the United States’ claim against Lockheed, he stands in the shoes of the government in receipt of a nontaxable recovery. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 5:51 pm
” Campbell v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 9:40 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 6:00 am
The Jacob Broom House in 1975 Jacob Broom, a modest and hardworking businessman, is one of the least known signers of the United States Constitution. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 7:41 pm
See United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 1:31 pm
Supreme Court in the case of Perez v. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 1:31 pm
Supreme Court in the case of Perez v. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 11:36 am
P. 26(f) (United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Utah) District of Vermont Rule 26. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 11:26 am
See United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 9:30 am
Conley, Jane Campbell Moriarty.Conley, John M.New York : Wolters Kluwer Law & Business, c2011.TZ2 .C765 2011Family LawInside the castle : law and the family in 20th century America / Joanna L. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 7:00 am
Since the United States Supreme Court decided State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 12:22 pm
Campbell, 538 U.S. 408, 425 (2003). [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 4:32 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 5:00 am
United of Omaha Life Insurance Co., 430 F. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 3:33 pm
In that regard, compare this fact pattern to United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 3:40 pm
On August 3, 2011, Litepanels, Inc. of Van Nuys, California and Litepanels, Ltd. of the United Kingdom (collectively, “Litepanels”) filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 8:19 am
Beginning on Feb. 20, 2011, the United States Navy and the FBI began negotiating with the pirates to secure the release of the hostages. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 1:38 pm
United States v. [read post]
