Search for: "Carter v. State"
Results 561 - 580
of 1,941
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2018, 5:43 am
After the Roe v. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 1:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 6:36 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 8:05 am
The recent decision by the supremes in Forest Grove Sch Dist v. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 7:36 am
Green gave the statement after defense attorney Sam Cappas secured a written agreement with Lake County Prosecutor Bernard Carter that the state wouldn't pursue the death penalty against Green. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 3:05 pm
’” State v. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 6:51 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2007, 7:31 am
This court upheld Smith's conviction and sentence in 2004, but the Supreme Court vacated his sentence in light of United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 4:01 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 3:00 am
See, also, Lambert v Board of Educ. of Middle Country Cent. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 3:10 am
Carter G. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 10:03 am
The court of appeals distinguished State v. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 1:48 am
Carter, 490 F.3d 641, 643 (8th Cir. 2007). [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 4:55 am
See United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 9:04 am
In Carter v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
TREATY ON EXTRADITION AND MUTUAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE REPUBLIC OF TURKEY AMERIKA BIRLESIK DEVLETLERI ILE TURKIYE CUMHURIYETI ARASINDA SUCLULARIN GERI VERILMESI CEZA ISLERINDE KARSILIKLI YARDIM ANLASMASI BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA A PROCLAMATION CONSIDERING THAT: The Treaty on Extradition and Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters between the United States of America and the Republic of Turkey,… [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 5:51 am
In RSUI Indemnity Company v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 1:49 pm
Today the 11th Circuit issued a per curiam decision on Kelvin Leon Jones, et al. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 9:44 am
Since the Court of Appeals is the highest court in the state and its holdings as to state law are binding on lower courts, one would have thought that the Appellate Divisions would refrain from upholding the denial of suppression motions on the ground that standing had not been established when no such claim had been raised by the People in response to the motion. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 1:48 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) John Hill v. [read post]
