Search for: "Colin Rule" Results 561 - 580 of 991
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2008, 7:28 am
Where notice to an excess carrier such as Connecticut is in issue, the focus is on whether the insured reasonably should have known that the claim against it would likely exhaust its primary insurance coverage and trigger its excess coverage, and whether any delay between acquiring that knowledge and giving notice to the excess carrier was reasonable under the circumstances[.]Finally, the First Department ruled that the "bobtail" exclusion in Connecticut's policy was void as… [read post]
24 Jul 2006, 3:48 am
Greenwood; articles by Colin Robert Crossman, Bryan A. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 1:45 am by Adam Wagner
In particular, see: Phone Hacking: Milly Dowler, Colin Stagg and a public inquiry? [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 4:33 am by Edith Roberts
” At Justia’s Verdict, Michael Dorf discusses Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s disapproval, which she later reconsidered, of NFL quarterback Colin Kaepernick’s refusal to stand for the national anthem; he observes that “even if Ginsburg’s criticism of Kaepernick was within the bounds of professional norms, that does not mean it was appropriate, … as she herself now recognizes. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 4:45 pm
The new judge is Lord Malcolm who, under his maiden name of Colin Campbell QC, was Senior Counsel for Norton in the patent infringement action of Organon v Norton joined with the Petition of Arrow Generics for revocation of the Tibolone patents (see IPKat note here). [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 10:03 am by Victoria Pynchon
My attorney husband and I have, for instance, heard Al Gore, Tony Blair, Condoleezza Rice, and Colin Powell speak and have been happy to listen even though we support some but not all of the views expressed by those individuals. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 3:30 am by Benjamin Wittes
 Bush Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld famously sparred with Secretary of State Colin Powell and his successor, Condoleezza Rice. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
., on Sunday, November 27, 2022 Tags: annual plans, ESG, ESG Performance, Executive Compensation, Institutional Investors, stakeholder capitalism, Stakeholders The corporate director’s guide to overseeing deals Posted by Maria Castañón Moats, Paul DeNicola, Colin Wittmer, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, on Monday, November 28, 2022 Tags: Board of Directors, Deal protection, Divestitures, Joint ventures, Management, Manager characteristics, Managerial style, Risk… [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 12:10 pm by Eric Turkewitz
I pointed out, of course, that the lawyers that wanted to do business with still had to comply with ethics rules. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 1:02 pm
The 1st Circuit ruled after a panel of the 9th Circuit, based in San Francisco, had ruled in the Margaret Witt case, overturning a trial judge's decision to dismiss that case, and sending it back to the federal district court in Washington State for discovery and trial. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 6:09 am
Bell, Fenwick & West LLP, on Wednesday, December 28, 2016 Tags: Boards of Directors, ESG, Executive Compensation, Peer groups, Proxy access, Proxy season, Proxy voting, Say on pay, Shareholder elections, Shareholder proposals, Shareholder voting, Surveys, Tech companies Female Directors, Board Committees and Firm Performance Posted by Colin Green and Swarnodeep Homroy, Lancaster University, on Thursday, December 29, 2016 Tags: Audit committee, Board composition, Boards of… [read post]
30 Aug 2009, 7:02 am
") Even if you have never heard of the FATF or its October 2008 Lawyer Guidance, please don't rule yourself out of this call for papers - you are in good company! [read post]
27 Jan 2025, 6:08 am by Jacqueline Lipton
Nelson, Yuval Feldman, Colin Provost, Wim Huisman, Phil Nichols, Antara Haldar, Eric Chaffee, Elysa Dishman, and Vera Cherepanova (ComplianceNet Steering Committee) [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm by Dan Flynn
District Court of Montana ruled in favor of USDA and the Montana Beef Council in the matter of R-CALF vs. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 3:14 am by Amy Howe
”  At In Progress, Colin Starger provides a “doctrinal map” for the case, while at Hamilton and Griffin on Rights Nancy Leong concludes that “several of the justices appeared skeptical of Elonis’ proposed subjective intent test, suggesting that the Court may break its lengthy string of pro-speech rulings. [read post]
5 May 2010, 10:03 am by Jeff Lipshaw
  Some thoughts on principles (or rules) as reduction, something I've been considering recently, below the break. [read post]