Search for: "Commonwealth v. Person, S." Results 561 - 580 of 2,384
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2019, 11:16 am by Daniel Cappetta
The Appeals Court reversed the denial of the defendant’s motion to suppress items seized pursuant to a warrantless search of his motor vehicle in Commonwealth v. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 1:36 pm by Lev Sugarman
Only selected applicants will be contacted for phone or in-person interviews. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 11:17 am by Daniel Cappetta
The Supreme Judicial Court affirmed the defendant’s conviction of deriving support from prostitution in Commonwealth v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 9:27 am by Nicholas Chan
In the district court’s decision in April, the judge held that “Exxon was subject to personal jurisdiction in Massachusetts by virtue of its control over franchises operating Exxon-branded gas stations in the Commonwealth. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 3:45 am by William Ford
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 3:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
The Superior Court in Mangel relied on its own 2011 decision in Commonwealth v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 4:49 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
Feb. 21, 2018), the Pennsylvania Supreme Court expressly overruled the long-followed 12-year-old Commonwealth Court decision in Fagan v. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 8:47 am by William Ford
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
The ‘ingredients’ of such a claim are set out in a developing body of case law: The public body’s statement “must be clear, unambiguous and devoid of relevant qualification” (R (Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2009] AC 453 at paragraph 60). [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 7:08 am by Anushka Limaye
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 5:31 am by Barry Sookman
Copying by a person for others knowing that it will result in copies of substantially the same material being provided to more than one person at substantially the same time and for substantially the same purpose would infringe copyright in the U.K, though it may not in Canada. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 11:50 am by Brandon Harter
We now have an answer to that question (at least in this Commonwealth) from Pennsylvania’s Supreme Court: Yes, yes it does. [read post]