Search for: "Company Doe v. Public Citizen" Results 561 - 580 of 1,988
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2019, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
And though people have an indubitable right to urge a boycott of Israeli companies,[3] it does not follow that the practice of refusing to deal with such companies based on the owners' nationality is also protected by the same principle. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 7:04 am by Joy Waltemath
On the other hand, an employee may state a common law claim for retaliatory discharge if the employer discharges the employee for reporting to someone within the company a federal law violation if the federal law at issue furthers the general welfare of Illinois citizens. [read post]
10 May 2017, 6:26 am by Kate Howard
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 2:04 pm by John Stigi and Kristin Housh
Although the Court in MIC declined to opine on whether the other two subsections of Rule 10b-5 — Rules 10b-5(a) and 10b-5(c) — may support liability for pure omissions, in Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 6:48 am by Joshua R. Goodbaum
He claimed that Comcast’s refusal to negotiate with ESN violated the first section of the Civil Rights Act of 1866 (https://codes.findlaw.com/us/title-42-the-public-health-and-welfare/42-usc-sect-1981.html), a Reconstruction-era law which provides that “[a]ll persons . . . shall have the same right . . . to make and enforce contracts . . . as is enjoyed by white citizens. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 11:07 am
Paul Levy wrote Public Citizen's response, titled "How not to write a cease and desist letter. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 4:59 pm
For publication opinions today (4): In Matthew Zachary v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 11:51 am by Alex Loomis
Enter Max Schrems, an Austrian citizen who joined Facebook in 2008. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 2:23 pm by Venkat
" Public Citizen (who litigated the case on behalf of Vernor): "Ninth Circuit says consumers may not own their software" ars technica: "No, you don't own it: Court upholds EULAs, threatens digital resale" Law prof. [read post]
2 Aug 2009, 12:42 pm by abiinniss
Further, the test as to whether confusion has occurred is set down by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) as per Case C-2511/95 Sabel BV v Puma AG [1998] European Trade Marks Report 1. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Michigan Chamber of Commerce and of the four dissenters in Citizens United v. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 8:50 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
These philosophies also found their way into the controversial 2010 SCOTUS decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 9:16 am by Brian Pascal
Through our cell phones and ubiquitous usage of other communications technology, modern citizens constantly and voluntarily shed information to private companies. [read post]