Search for: "Cost v. State"
Results 561 - 580
of 31,583
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2024, 12:11 pm
” https://fedsoc.org/events/consumers-research-v-fcc-and-the-legality-of-the-universal-service-fund-contribution-regime. [read post]
14 May 2024, 12:11 pm
” https://fedsoc.org/events/consumers-research-v-fcc-and-the-legality-of-the-universal-service-fund-contribution-regime. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:27 am
" The Supreme Court reaffirmed this in Regan v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 7:15 am
”[14] ETC Designation for BIAS Providers: High Cost and Lifeline Support. [read post]
14 May 2024, 6:00 am
Matter of Davis v Schley2024 NY Slip Op 02614Decided on May 10, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentPublished by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 10, 2024Before: Moulton, J.P., Scarpulla, Shulman, Higgitt, O'Neill-Levy, JJ.Index No. 153380/24 Appeal No. 2415 Case No. 2024-02974[*1]In the Matter of… [read post]
14 May 2024, 6:00 am
Matter of Davis v Schley2024 NY Slip Op 02614Decided on May 10, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentPublished by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 10, 2024Before: Moulton, J.P., Scarpulla, Shulman, Higgitt, O'Neill-Levy, JJ.Index No. 153380/24 Appeal No. 2415 Case No. 2024-02974[*1]In the Matter of… [read post]
13 May 2024, 9:06 pm
” “In addition, this bill could further increase receipts to the State General Fund from civil penalties (ranging from $100 for a Class II violation up to $10,000 for a Class V violation), imposed on food sales establishments that violate the provisions of this bill. [read post]
13 May 2024, 7:36 am
X Corp. v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:45 am
City of New York v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:00 am
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:00 am
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs. [read post]
13 May 2024, 4:55 am
In Citizens for Clean Air & Clean Water in Brazoria County et al v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 4:54 am
In addition, a Satisfaction of Judgment was filed on February 24,2021 stating that the Judgment was paid in full and the sum of $0.00 remains unpaid (NYSCEF Doc. [read post]
13 May 2024, 4:05 am
In Zăicescu and Fălticineanu v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 12:57 am
On Tuesday 14 May 2024 there will be an application for security for costs in the case of Sikhs for Justice and another v Ranger KB-2022-004490 and a statement in open court in the case of Davies -v- BBC–KB-2024-000828. [read post]
12 May 2024, 9:05 pm
ENDNOTE [1] Basic v. [read post]
11 May 2024, 10:09 am
This money judgment, however, only states that a party must pay a particular sum. [read post]
10 May 2024, 5:37 pm
The California Supreme Court’s decision in Naranjo v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
