Search for: "Court of Criminal Appeals" Results 561 - 580 of 51,212
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The UK Court of Appeal ruled Thursday that the UK National Crime Agency’s (NCA) refusal to investigate the importation of Uyghur forced labour cotton from China was unlawful. [read post]
The relevant brief highlights that the current legal opinion on the matter is divided and thus is inconsistently applied throughout the district and appeal courts. [read post]
29 Jun 2024, 4:34 am by INFORRM
The Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dismissed the case after considering there was no violation of the First Amendment. [read post]
The ruling vacates an earlier decision by the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, which had ruled in favor of a broader interpretation of Section 1512(c)(2). [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 7:05 pm by Matthew D. Roy
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit later reversed this decision, ruling that the Bankruptcy Code allowed for the approval of the plan and affirmed the bankruptcy court’s decision, enabling the release of certain claims against the debtor. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 3:15 pm by Amy Howe
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied Bannon’s motion for release pending appeal. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Pennsylvania man is convicted of murder and appeals through the state court system. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 10:48 am by Amy Howe
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, which upheld the lower court’s ruling. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 10:11 am by Amy Howe
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit reversed Nichols’ ruling, concluding that the “meaning of the statute is unambiguous,” so that it “applies to all forms of corrupt obstruction of an official proceeding, other than the conduct that is already covered by” the prior subsection. [read post]
On appeal, the Fourth Circuit—noting it was bound by longstanding circuit precedent—affirmed the district court’s application of the “clear and convincing evidence” standard to E.M.D. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 8:40 am by Ryan Goodman
United States mean for former President Donald Trump’s D.C. criminal case and the hundreds of other January 6th defendants? [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 5:40 am by John Fingleton
Concerning its activities in cloud services, the CMA faced some legal setbacks but won, overall, in court. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Masks Are Going from Mandated to Criminalized in Some States MSN – Fenit Nirappil (Washington Post) | Published: 6/24/2024 State legislators and law enforcement are reinstating dormant laws that criminalize mask-wearing to penalize pro-Palestinian protesters who conceal their faces, raising concerns among covid-cautious Americans. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 11:42 am by Tom Smith
" Idaho appealed, and the Supreme Court reversed the block in January, allowing the law to be enforced while the legal battle continued. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 11:26 am by Amy Howe
Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit that bars the federal government from enforcing EMTALA in Texas. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 10:27 am by Nancy E. Halpern, D.V.M.
”[6] The Criminal Court ruled that the prosecution had not shown that the cat had been injured and thus dismissed the charge for torturing and injuring an animal.[7] However, the prosecution appealed and the State Supreme Court found that the “defendant’s actions tended to cause unjustifiable physical pain, and, thus, that defendant had cruelly beaten the cat in violation of Agriculture and Markets Law § 353. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 10:27 am by Nancy E. Halpern, D.V.M.
”[6] The Criminal Court ruled that the prosecution had not shown that the cat had been injured and thus dismissed the charge for torturing and injuring an animal.[7] However, the prosecution appealed and the State Supreme Court found that the “defendant’s actions tended to cause unjustifiable physical pain, and, thus, that defendant had cruelly beaten the cat in violation of Agriculture and Markets Law § 353. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 8:47 am by Howard Friedman
  The Supreme Court did this in a per curiam order that vacated a previous stay of the injunction issued by the Supreme Court and which returned the case to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, finding that certiorari had been improvidently granted.Justice Kagan, joined by Justice Sotomayor filed an opinion concurring with the dismissal, saying in part: Idaho’s arguments about EMTALA do not justify, and have never justified, either emergency… [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 7:29 am by Phil Dixon
The Arizona Court of Appeals affirmed the convictions, relying on state precedent permitting a substitute analyst to testify to an independent opinion by using the report of a non-testifying witness as the basis of opinion. [read post]