Search for: "Cross v. State" Results 561 - 580 of 16,690
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2006, 1:46 pm
Another, to some extent the other side of the same coin, is whether the earlier opportunity should be deemed inadequate because some information that might have been used in cross and that is available at trial was not available at the time of the earlier proceeding.In People v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 11:45 am by Medicare Set Aside Services
Yet wait is what we shall continue to do… BIO-MEDICAL APPLICATIONS OF TENNESSEE, INC., Individually and asassignee of Patient, dba BMA of Kingsport, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v.CENTRAL STATES SOUTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST AREAS HEALTH ANDWELFARE FUND, Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee.Nos. 09-6121/6169UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT11a0251p.06; 2011 U.S. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 6:15 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here is the cert petition in Pauma Band of Luiseño Mission Indians of the Pauma & Yuima Reservation v. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 1:14 pm
Greg May has brought to my attention a significant en banc decision, United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
The statement was made out of court so the “declarant” (person who made the statement) is unable to be cross-examined.The tricky part: hearsay may be admitted if the statement is not offered prove the truth of what was actually stated. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 7:11 am by Jaclyn Belczyk
EME Homer City Generation [transcript, PDF; JURIST report] the court is considering the authority of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) [official website] under the Clean Air Act [text, PDF] to issue a regulation limiting power plants' emissions that cross state lines. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 2:46 pm
If the name Jeb Corliss doesn't ring a bell, he is the guy who got busted trying to parachute off the Empire State Building in July 2006. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 2:46 am by traceydennis
What was sufficiently serious depended on the circumstances of the case, and in particular the state of knowledge of the claimant under the cross-undertaking at the relevant time; but the claimant’s conduct had to be assessed having regard to the fact that the claim was for compensation under a cross-undertaking. [read post]