Search for: "D. Crawford" Results 561 - 580 of 926
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2010, 3:46 am by Russ Bensing
Ohio, but would now be testimonial under Crawford v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 10:36 am by Kent Scheidegger
Bryant -- Confrontation Clause, Crawford, and questioning of wounded victim at the scene.Los Angeles Co. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 8:42 am by michael
Regina v Thompson, Regina v Crawford, Regina v Gomulu, Regina v Allen, Regina v Blake, Regina v Kasunga; [2010] EWCA Crim 1623; [2010] WLR (D) 183 “The collective responsibility of the jury was not confined to the verdict. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 9:58 am by Randall Hodgkinson
Craig is good law after Crawford is one that we have litigated occassionally (blogged about here). [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 3:31 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
On the Legislative Forays of the CouncilAndrew Clapham, The Subject of Subjects and the Attribution of AttributionMonique Chemillier-Gendreau, La désuétude de l’article 26 de la Charte des Nations Unies, expression de l’échec du système onusienLuigi Condorelli, Le Conseil de sécurité, les sanctions ciblées et le respect des droits de l’hommeMarcelo G. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 5:26 am by Russ Bensing
  These are clearly “testimonial” statements under Crawford v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 12:16 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Adler) Jan Crawford reports that Senator Jeff Sessions, ranking Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee, has said some of the memos Elena Kagan wrote as a clerk for Justice Thurgood Marshall are “troubling” and warrant greater scrutiny. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 7:12 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Adler) Jan Crawford reports on memos Elena Kagan wrote for Justice Thurgood Marshall during her clerkship that appear to reveal that she is quite liberal on social issues. [read post]
27 May 2010, 5:30 am by William Carleton
Dow Jones Newswires reported that the president of the organization, Denise Crawford, acknowledges that a 120 day waiting period is too long. [read post]
24 May 2010, 1:05 pm by Kent Scheidegger
§2254(d) prevent the overturning of contrary judgments affirmed before Giles? [read post]