Search for: "D. PIERCE" Results 561 - 580 of 1,187
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2014, 5:09 am by Robert Kreisman
  On appeal, the Illinois Appellate Court affirmed by stating that Dass and Garry “do not argue that Yale defrauded them in his individual capacity and do not argue that Yale should be liable through the doctrine of piercing the corporate veil. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Starbuzz Tobacco Inc.: What hookahs can teach us about 3-D printing, copyright. http://t.co/ntl2HgEBrv -> EU Overhaul of Collective Rights Management for Online Music http://t.co/Ce5tGsnR34 -> Employer Who Takes Over Employee’s Social Media Accounts May Commit Privacy Breach–Maremont v Susan Fredman Design http://t.co/cGEnphRaic -> Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2014-03-05 http://t.co/ehjHxVhooT -> Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2014-03-05:… [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 5:41 pm by Colin O'Keefe
– Coeur d’Alene lawyer James Bendell of The Grupp Law Firm on his blog, Injury in Idaho Hit Reset and Blow On the Cartridge –No Coverage for Sony Based on Hackers’ Actions – Jonathan L. [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 8:05 am by Scott Riddle
“[R]everse veil piercing extends the traditional veil piercing doctrine to permit a third-party creditor to pierce the veil to satisfy the debts of an individual out of the corporation’s assets. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 1:42 pm by John Elwood
§ 2254(d)(2) merely because the state court does not conduct an evidentiary hearing. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 10:20 am by Ron Coleman
[Plaintiff failed to allege that d]efendant, as a non-employee (but founder) of the new company, was personally responsible for the content of the new company’s website. [read post]
We need them to pierce through the apparent web of lies and defenses the CIA has spun for years about its torture program to Congress, the executive branch — and the American people. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
  As a quick perusal confirms, most of those amicus briefs are devoted to the question of whether for-profit corporations have “consciences,” or can exercise religion--which is also the first question discussed in the government’s opening brief in Hobby Lobby.I am dubious about this focus on the “corporate religious exercise” question; it is, I think, something of a diversion from what’s truly at stake in these cases, and the Court has no need to issue any… [read post]