Search for: "DAVIS v. CALIFORNIA"
Results 561 - 580
of 1,764
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2012, 4:30 am
Last month, a California district court also held the good faith exception to be applicable (United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 8:29 am
Davis L. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 8:09 am
Davis Medical Center, Mercy, or Sutter. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 6:49 am
Kenniston v. [read post]
23 May 2010, 8:41 am
Davis Medical Center, Mercy, or Sutter. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 8:09 am
Davis Medical Center, Mercy, or Sutter. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 6:00 am
Brown v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 7:33 am
” Davis v. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 8:30 am
It also rejected his religious freedom claims based on occasional failures of his meal trays to include all items that should have been on the religious diet tray.In Davis v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 3:34 am
California (2003) -- ex post facto clause as applied to changes in statutes of limitationsAlabama v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 9:01 pm
For example, in the famous and controversial case of Rust v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
DAVIS Richard D. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 5:47 pm
Supreme Court cases Davis v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 7:05 am
The Court also denied certiorari in a dispute over land transfers in California, as Greenwire reports. [read post]
5 Jun 2011, 12:32 pm
LEXIS 57710 (ED CA, May 31, 2011), a California federal magistrate judge rejected a claim by a state prisoner that his rights were violated when unidentified prison mail room staff confiscated tarot cards, incense, an incense burner, and a set of gem stones sent as a donation to the Lefthand Path, a religion in which Plaintiff was a high priest.In Davis v. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 8:40 pm
Birke v. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 7:13 am
See Textron Financial Corp. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 9:39 am
The Washington Supreme Court struck down the Washington statute as unconstitutional in Davis v. [read post]
22 May 2019, 9:01 pm
Hardwick in Lawrence v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 5:08 am
Bill 1X 26; see also Professional Engineers in California Government v. [read post]
