Search for: "DOE et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al"
Results 561 - 580
of 598
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2008, 6:31 pm
Producers Guild of America, Inc., Et Al. (2nd Dist., Div. 5, March 25, 2008) No. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 3:14 pm
., et al. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 8:58 am
Friendfinder Network, et. al. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 8:58 am
Friendfinder Network, et. al. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
Shame about the IP: (Afro-IP),Ethiopia receives US trade mark for Sidamo coffee despite opposition from Starbucks: (The IP Factor), (Afro-IP),CC licensed test for African sleeping sickness: (creativecommons.org),Update on PCT applications filed in Nigeria: (Afro-IP),Parallel imports of DVDs to be tested in South Africa: Universal City Studios v Mr Video: (Afro-IP),The W****D C*P of 2*1*: FIFA’s intellectual property rights in South Africa: (Afro-IP),Namibia to adopt… [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 11:21 am
Charge filed by United Workers of America Local 621; complaint alleged violation of Section 8(a)(1) and (5). [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:10 pm
MASON et al. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:12 pm
– Justice Otto Moore of the Colorado Supreme Court, 1956 In this day and age of near constant, twenty-four hour news coverage, accessible through numerous television outlets (to wit, CNN, CSPAN, Fox News, MSNB, et al.), as well as through the more recent medium of internet distribution, access to the inner-workings of our government, on both the state and federal levels, is at an all-time high. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
In this litigation, plaintiff The Upper Deck Company, et al. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (Spicy IP),USD 20 billion going off-patent: (Patent Circle),Canadian Prices Review Board asserts jurisdiction over products sold in US, but imported into Canada under Special Access Program: (Gowlings),Canadian Court of Appeal affirms decision allowing patent-owner to be joined to proceedings: Cobalt v Pfizer and Pharmascience v Pfizer: (Gowlings),PharmaStem appeals stem cell patent: asks for greater deference to patent examiners:… [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 6:20 am
Teleflex Inc. et al. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 3:45 am
Ngati, et al., No. 05 Civ. 2585 (JFB), 2006 U.S. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 6:36 am
The President does (Nixon v. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 9:00 am
: (IP Spotlight)PharmaIndia: Trade mark assignment under scrutiny in a case of deceptive similarity - Doctor Morepen Limited v Yash Pharma Laboratories Limited: (Mondaq),Arrow v Merck - An early route to market for generics? [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 2:12 pm
And so… for a short time… we move away from the blawgs of the United States of America…. [read post]
31 Dec 2007, 1:45 am
Robert Brennan et al. [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 9:03 am
" Marbury v. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 10:32 am
" See United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 8:55 am
While current laws do provide some protection against imitation goods, such protection is only for trademarked goods and does not provide any protection when the good is copied under a slightly different logo or label. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 10:57 pm
Supreme Court was reasonably similar in this respect... before Bush v. [read post]
