Search for: "DOE et al v. United States"
Results 561 - 580
of 3,163
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2021, 6:42 am
B.L., a Minor, By and Through her Father, LEVY, et al., No. 20-55 (June 23, 2021), Brandi Levy, a student of Mahanoy Area High School, was cut from the school’s varsity cheerleading squad and placed on the junior varsity squad. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 6:42 am
B.L., a Minor, By and Through her Father, LEVY, et al., No. 20-55 (June 23, 2021), Brandi Levy, a student of Mahanoy Area High School, was cut from the school’s varsity cheerleading squad and placed on the junior varsity squad. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 6:42 am
B.L., a Minor, By and Through her Father, LEVY, et al., No. 20-55 (June 23, 2021), Brandi Levy, a student of Mahanoy Area High School, was cut from the school’s varsity cheerleading squad and placed on the junior varsity squad. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 6:49 am
Weisblat, et al., v. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 6:49 am
Weisblat, et al., v. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 5:38 am
Wall-Street.com, LLC, et al. has arrived. [read post]
3 May 2018, 4:43 pm
Makah Indian Tribe, et al. v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 4:43 pm
Makah Indian Tribe, et al. v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 2:28 am
"
United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 9:40 am
Until June 6th, Bishop et al v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 5:00 pm
Obama, President of the United States, et al. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 3:44 am
Accordingly, although the United States may have a regulatory interest in the E-Rate program, the United States does not have a financial stake in its fraudulent losses. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 7:22 am
Amtran Technology Co., Ltd., et al, 1-12-cv-00644 (TXWD March 19, 2014, Order) (Yeakel, J.) [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 7:05 am
Solid, Inc. et al, 5-14-cv-03750 (CAND September 28, 2015, Order) (Grewal, M.J.) [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 5:07 pm
Citizens and their foreign fiancés brought suit against the United States government in the case Daniel Milligan, et al., v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 8:00 am
., et al. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 11:52 am
In light of the decision in Loving et al v Commissioner where the court ruled that the Internal Revenue Service did not have the authority to regulate tax preparers, the IRS has issued the following statement: As of Friday, Jan. 18, 2013, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia has enjoined the Internal Revenue Service from enforcing the regulatory requirements for registered tax return preparers. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 10:50 am
., et al. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 11:44 am
Facts: This case (Marland et al v. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 11:30 am
HTC Corporation, et al.- United States District Court – Eastern District of Virginia – March 15th, 2017) involves a claim of trademark infringement. [read post]
