Search for: "DOES 1 through 100, inclusive"
Results 561 - 580
of 599
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2009, 9:26 pm
Likewise, lawyers need to realize that much of the referral process can be automated and made more accurate through computer systems - but the fact that a computer sorts through information does not mean that it is making recommendations. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 9:06 am
For the year prior to October of 2008, Plaintiff Sura Bhandi had consulted with and employed Defendants Wellness Center, Tim Jones, D.C., and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, and each of them, to examine, diagnosis, treat and provide chiropractic care for soreness in her shoulders and back. 7. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 6:31 pm
We focus also on the relevant Georgia-Pacific factors, as presented to the jury through all the evidence and particularly the experts' testimony. 1. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 9:58 am
The true names and capacities, whether individual, corporate, associate, or otherwise, of Defendants DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, are unknown to Plaintiff who therefore sues said DOE Defendants by fictitious names. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 5:06 am
Existing law, until January 1, 2013,prohibits a mortgagee, trustee, beneficiary, or authorized agent from filinga notice of default for an additional 30 days on loans made between January1, 2003, to December 31, 2007, that secure residential real property, undercertain circumstances.This bill would, until January 1, 2013, provide that these provisions applyto mortgages and deeds of trust recorded between January 1, 2003, toDecember 31, 2007, secured by owner-occupied… [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 8:36 am
The true names and capacities, whether individual, corporate, associate or otherwise, of Defendants sued herein as DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, are currently unknown to PLAINTIFFS, who therefore sue said Defendants by such fictitious names. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 6:45 am
In no way does it sound like it’s being simplified – just from the description. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 11:52 am
Premise #1. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 2:34 am
Several law firms are cutting associate pay.In any event, for the first time since the beginning of the year, we are seeing a slowdown in terms of overall layoff numbers:1,125 (May 2009)1,500 (April 2009)3,500 (March 2009)2,000 (February 2009)1,500 (January 2009)Does this mean that the worst of the layoffs are behind us? [read post]
25 May 2009, 2:48 am
In any event, for the first time since the beginning of the year, we are seeing a slowdown in terms of overall layoff numbers:1,125 (May 2009)1,500 (April 2009)3,500 (March 2009)2,000 (February 2009)1,500 (January 2009)Does this mean that the worst of the layoffs are behind us? [read post]
19 May 2009, 12:00 am
Consumers need to be cautious of seemingly attractive cheap, all inclusive deals. [read post]
16 May 2009, 3:09 am
NUPP Legal provides these links merely as a convenience and the inclusion of such links does not imply that NUPP Legal, NUPP Legal's affiliates or suppliers endorse or accept any responsibility for the content or uses of such Web sites.Which brings me to a question: why are you considering using these forms without an attorney? [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:08 am
Wife earned roughly $8.00 per hour through her part-time employment. [read post]
4 May 2009, 2:13 am
___________________________________________________________________The list below contains law firms who have begun layoffs in late 2008 through May 2009 (We will be updating this list daily). [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 1:48 pm
YouTube’s viewership was upwards of 400 billion views last year, while start-up Hulu enjoyed 100 million hits. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 4:19 pm
” The House version is H.R. 1, as passed on January 28, 2009, with a 244 to 188 vote margin. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 3:14 pm
MIPPA also extends funding through 2009 for the Qualifying Individual program, through which Medicaid programs subsidizes Medicare Part B premiums for low-income individuals. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 1:48 pm
At Harvard Law, roughly 1/3 of the class scored below the 50th percentile. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 3:36 am
On November 1, 2007, thisCourt affirmed the denial of all relief. [read post]
21 Jun 2008, 10:01 am
State, No.SC07-1603 (November 1, 2007). [read post]
