Search for: "DOES 1-121" Results 561 - 580 of 1,229
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
Legal blogging advocates [1] encourage lawyers that they can blog and they should blog and they will receive great benefit from blogging; similar advocacy-tinged advice touches on writing for other social-media platforms such as Twitter and LinkedIn. [2] Public legal writing is not new. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 12:38 pm
Eli Lilly & Co., 620 F.3d 121 (2d Cir. 2010), which took home best decision in 2010 by reversing the second worst decision of 2008. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 7:57 am by Raul "Pete" Pedrozo, James Kraska
Islands are naturally formed areas above water at high tide [Article 121(1)]. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 6:16 am
A military judge abuses his discretion if he accepts a guilty plea without an adequate factual basis to support it or if he does so based on an erroneous view of the law. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 4:50 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
Tcherniakov does not change the dialogue which is not even spoken during the final scene, nor the music, as the orchestra dutifully played each sound of the falling guillotine even though there was no guillotine on stage. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
Children's National Medical Center, 121 A.3d 59, 66 (D.C. 2015) (adopting Restatement §500 “high degree of risk of harm” standard).Florida:  Dyals v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 7:00 am
  Moreover, all of that product would be infringing as the “product of the process” under Section 60(1)(c) of the Patents Act, so that subsequent dealing with it would also be an infringement. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 6:58 am
  The relevant claims of the patent were as follows:1. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 11:51 am by Alex Loomis
Bot then turned to the Commission’s determination that the safe harbor provided for “adequate” data protection (¶121). [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
Wiretap Act (also known as Title III) prohibits the interception of a live communication (e.g., a telephone call) only if the interception occurs in the United States; it does not prohibit or regulate wiretaps (interception) conducted abroad.[8]  Similarly, the U.S. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 9:00 pm by Karel Frielink
At that stage the counsel usually does not yet have all the relevant details at his disposal. [read post]