Search for: "David R. Andrews" Results 561 - 580 of 1,818
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2017, 2:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
NassirMedical Theory and Its Notions of Definition and ExplanationHucklenbroich, PeterCultural Influences on Medical KnowledgeHughes, David Hippocrates and the Hippocratic Tradition: Impact on Development of Medical Knowledge and Practice? [read post]
7 Jan 2017, 8:41 pm by Patent Docs
David Conrad of Fish & Richardson PC, Brian Mudge of Andrews Kurth Kenyon LLP, and Michael Rosato of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati will discuss the Blue Calypso v. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 10:46 pm by Jeff Richardson
Andrew Hawward of Macworld shares his list of the 20 best iOS games of 2016. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 10:53 am by Quinta Jurecic
On that note, David Ryan reported on last Thursday’s hearing at Guantanamo. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 6:27 am by Eugene Volokh
Anonymous John Doe 1, another Florida case, this one filed by lawyer Steven Andrews. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 6:41 am by Joe May
” Trump Adviser Has Pushed Clinton Conspiracy TheoriesPolitico – Bryan Bender and Andrew Hanna | Published: 12/5/2016 Before the election, Lt. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 8:54 am by Kelly Buchanan
” In August 2016, it was announced that a national day to commemorate the wars would be observed from 2017, with the date later set as October 28 – the date of the signing of the Declaration of Independence. 1847: In R v Symonds, the Supreme Court recognized the doctrine of aboriginal title as part of New Zealand law and upheld the government’s preemptive right to purchase Māori land. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 7:04 am by Maria Kendrick
The referendum was of course advisory, as stated in paragraph 106 of the judgment, and even accepted by the most high profile Leave campaigner, Nigel Farage, speaking on speaking on the Andrew Marr show5)BBC Andrea Marr show 6 November 2016. [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 4:07 am by Kevin LaCroix
In the following guest post, attorneys from the Paul Weiss law firm review and analyze a November 3, 2016  Second Circuit decision (here)  in which the appellate court held that the standard pre-IPO lock-up agreements between a company’s pre-IPO shareholders and the company’s lead IPO underwriters do not make those parties a “group” within Section 13(d) of the ’34 Act, and therefore that the lock-up agreement alone is insufficient to trigger Section 16(b)… [read post]