Search for: "Deal v. USA" Results 561 - 580 of 1,303
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2015, 12:36 pm
The first of these is GO Outdoors Ltd v Skechers USA Inc II [2015] EWHC 1405 (Ch), a 19 May decision of Mrs Justice Rose, sitting in the Chancery Division, England and Wales, on an appeal from a decision of the UK Intellectual Property Office. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 10:19 am by NCC Staff
(The actual malice test goes back to the Supreme Court’s landmark New York Times v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 11:21 am by Quinta Jurecic , Staley Smith
Paul posted about how the Supreme Court’s recent decision in City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:17 am by Eric Goldman
Because Rightscorp therefore cannot satisfy the notice requirements of Section 512(c)(3)(A), a subpoena cannot be issued under Section 512(h). * BWP Media USA, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm by MOTP
Justice Eva Guzman agreed on this disposition, but wrote a separate concurring opinion addressing the implications for the ethical responsibilities of attorneys in their dealings with prospective clients. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:40 am by Amy Howe
The ImmigrationProf Blog continues its online symposium on Kerry v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 9:24 am
This post deals with a more mainstream IP topic, patent validity, which was the subject of the "Validity is king" breakout session. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 4:52 am by SHG
As reported in the Guardian: Every state in the US fails to comply with international standards on the lethal use of force by law enforcement officers, according to a report by Amnesty International USA, which also says 13 US states fall beneath even lower legal standards enshrined in US constitutional law and that nine states currently have no laws at all to deal with the issue. [read post]
20 Jun 2015, 9:30 am by Staley Smith
Circuit ruling last week, Zoe Bedell presented us an overview of the DC Circuit’s Opinion in Al Bahlul v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 1:49 am
 With this background, consider the following decision of the Court of Appeal of British Columbia (BC) in  Equustek Solutions Inc. v Google Inc., 2015 BCCA 265, released on 15 June 2015. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 7:13 am
 As Jeremy explains, it deals with the ‘Kit Kat’ chocolate-snack and its protection as trade mark.* A taste of things to come? [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 11:58 am by Nassiri Law
Other times, we are dealing with an accounting or payroll error, which results in accidental withholding of wages. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 3:45 am by Ron Coleman
 This seemed to have been confirmed by the decision, not long afterwards, in Penguin Group (USA) Inc. v. [read post]