Search for: "Defendant Doe 1"
Results 561 - 580
of 46,095
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2009, 12:58 pm
The fact that the defendant could access child pornography does not advance the Commonwealth's contention that the defendant copied child pornography from Joester onto his computer. ... [read post]
18 Aug 2007, 1:52 pm
The "continuing operation" theory noted in Davidson, Miggins, and Newton does not exist here based upon the factual declaration contained in the affidavit. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 2:32 pm
Reid, Case No. 286784, holding that a circuit court does not have jurisdiction to try a defendant on a misdemeanor criminal charge, where the original accompanying felony charge was dismissed before trial. [read post]
12 May 2009, 7:49 pm
., General Medical Center, a Corporation, and Does 1 through 250, inclusive, Defendants. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 5:48 am
Defendant does not get a Franks hearing on omitted information because every affidavit omits something. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 10:56 am
Does 1-19, the District of Columbia case, being handled by Matthew Oppenheim personally, which targets students at George Washington University, the Court -- after reading the motion to quash filed by John Doe #3 -- has on its own initiative issued an Order to Show Cause ordering the plaintiffs to show cause, on or before November 29th:-why the defendant's motion should not be granted; and-why the Court's ruling should not be applicable to all of the… [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 7:13 am
The record does not support defendant's contention that officers created the exigency. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 9:01 pm
April 20, 2011) (unpublished).* Applying the rule that courts should decide cases on the narrowest grounds possible, the stop here was justified by the load on defendant’s trailer being too wide, so the validity of the administrative inspection does not have to be decided. [read post]
30 Mar 2021, 8:22 am
§ 1A-1, Rule 23. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 9:11 pm
Kenya is prosecuting a number of the Somali piracy trials, and an attorney representing many of the defendants may take the position that Kenyan law does not provide for jurisidction. [read post]
31 Jul 2010, 9:15 pm
§ 923(g)(1)(B)(ii), the government may conduct compliance inspections of gun shop premises without either a warrant or reasonable cause, as long as it does not do so more than once in any twelve-month period. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 8:17 am
On Dec. 1, 2020, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Nestlé USA, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 8:03 am
LEXIS 1131 (December 1, 2010): That the text messages were stored in electronic form in Hawkins’s cell phone, rather than in plain view, does not deny the officer the right to discover them. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 3:54 am
Defendant made a sufficient showing to get the CI’s identity under Roviaro on the question of defendant’s standing. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 7:48 am
John Does 1-23 Court Case Number: 1:12-cv-00841-SEB-DKLFile Date: Monday, June 18, 2012Plaintiff: Malibu Media, LLCPlaintiff Counsel: Paul J. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 4:47 am
Defendant’s invitation to “check” the car (“Morgan then asked whether the defendant had anything ‘illegal’ in the Altima. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 10:50 am
There are two main subjects that tend to come up where there are major differences: 1. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 9:23 am
Among other defendants, the victim sued Snapchat for negligence. [read post]
15 Sep 2007, 4:25 pm
Defendant received a package at work that apparently was intended for him but did not have his name on it. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 2:07 pm
The lawsuit does indeed seemed barred by the litigation privilege. [read post]
