Search for: "Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs, interested parties"
Results 561 - 580
of 1,422
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2010, 5:23 pm
Even thought I am more likely to purchase a box of cookies than I am to sign a political petition, I have never considered the privacy implications of signing a petition, until now. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:23 pm
Even thought I am more likely to purchase a box of cookies than I am to sign a political petition, I have never considered the privacy implications of signing a petition, until now. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 1:08 pm
The trial court granted the motion, holding that plaintiff had no legal interest in his “at-will” employment; that the selectboard members have qualified immunity from the civil-rights claim; there’s no private right of action under Chapter I, Article 4 of the Vermont Constitution; and plaintiff’s claims didn’t meet all the promissory estoppel requirements. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 4:26 pm
” In fact, Judge Pregerson said, “all the policy and reasoning in Morrison point in the other direction. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 12:00 pm
The evidence submitted also demonstrates that, upon his death, the plaintiffs gave timely notice of the intent to redeem the decedent's shares of stock and thereby exercised the right to purchase his interest in accordance with the shareholder's agreement. [read post]
18 May 2020, 7:54 am
This theory worked for those plaintiffs who purchased Google devices, but several plaintiffs either did not purchase Google devices or (in the case of minors) were not interacting with a device that they purchased. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 5:17 pm
Commentators (including me) have long speculated about the possible future direction of data breach-related litigation. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 5:21 pm
GRASSO, Appellee. 2nd District.Arbitration -- Waiver -- Action by partnership formed to purchase arena football team against defendant who expressed interest in becoming part owner of team, entered into agreement with partnership under which defendant was provided confidential business information, and then purchased part ownership in team after direct negotiations with owner without knowledge of partners -- Partners did not waive right to arbitrate action against… [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 11:08 am
These “third-party sellers” select their own products, source them from manufacturers or distributors, set the purchase price, and use Amazon’s website to reach consumers. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 1:26 pm
Common Law and Equitable Causes of Action Apart from the Act, private litigants may seek redress for anticompetitive conduct pursuant to various common law torts (e.g., civil conspiracy and unlawful interference with economic interests) and equitable causes of action (e.g., unjust enrichment). [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 10:53 am
Aug. 24, 2009): "Plaintiff argues for personal jurisdiction on the grounds that Defendant purchased two of Plaintiff's trademarks from internet search engines, so that those engines would display Defendant's advertisements when Plaintiff's word marks were searched….Defendant's uncontroverted affidavit avers that its Adwords were selected by the search engines and were purchased before… [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 6:57 am
Not that “Axanar” would somehow serve as a market substitute for the original works on which it is based; the court wasn’t suggesting that people will watch/purchase “Axanar”&nb [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 7:16 am
Case Background In September, 2011, Appellee James Wilson and Decedent Joseph Gorman entered into a contract in which Gorman agreed to purchase a 15% interest in Marine 1, LLC for $300,000, to be paid in a series of payments. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:40 am
As to her estate, Plaintiff testified on re-direct and re-cross concerning her purchase of a rental property for roughly $95,000 with money loaned to her by a friend. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 8:20 am
McWhinney’s effect may be that plaintiffs’ attorneys ramp up efforts to bring intentional tort claims. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 5:08 am
” The report contains a series of recommendations directed at various parties, including federal and state governments, state courts, and debt buyers. [read post]
3 May 2019, 6:51 am
” Therefore, although the plaintiffs’ interests and Depianti’s interests may align, that overlap was insufficient to establish privity for preclusion purposes. [read post]
23 Dec 2018, 7:53 am
The Consent Order applies to the parties to it and their successors in interest, and TSI does not admit or deny any of the Consent Order's findings of fact or conclusions of law. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 10:04 am
Plaintiffs often assert that “testers have standing” to bring ADA claims despite the fact that they do not intend to purchase goods or services. [read post]
14 Nov 2020, 3:35 am
But in this case, a 5-4 majority of the justices determined that consumers were actually direct purchasers from Apple--as opposed to considering app developers to be the ones who pay Apple's 30% commission.Google says developers can't seek damages based on an overcharge that, if there was one (which Google obviously disputes) would belong to consumers according to the Supreme Court opinion in Pepper. [read post]
